General Discussion

brush

(59,628 posts)

18. Again, replacing Dems with other Dems does not gain the majority.

Reply to iemanja (Reply #17)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 09:16 PM

Thursday

Defeat magat republicans, not Democrats. Not complicated. Getting the majority is the whole point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cha Keepthesoulalive DFW Oopsie Daisy

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Hogg is being paid a six figure salary by his PAC and may be using DNC emails to raise money for this PAC [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Thursday OP

he said he was gonna spend $20 mil but do not recall him providing the source of the money nt msongs Thursday #1

I believe the source is his pac Leaders We Deserve Meowmee Yesterday #38

A large salary, indeed. It looks to be three times the salary Nixie 2 hrs ago #68

Like "If you write a best-selling book, you can be a millionaire too" -- also complaining about Democrats! betsuni 1 hr ago #69

Keep your eyes on the prize........... Lovie777 Thursday #2

So what! Do you think he's the only one? Sewa Thursday #3

I'll tell you what's wrong. Primarying sitting Dems with another Dem doesn't get us... brush Thursday #6

Refusing to do so gets the 2024 results iemanja Thursday #15

It's not that hard to understand. Subbing one Dem for annother gets us 2024 all over again. brush Thursday #16

Approval of Democrats is at an all-time low iemanja Thursday #17

Again, replacing Dems with other Dems does not gain the majority. brush Thursday #18

Is your point that it's a lost cause? iemanja Thursday #21

New blood does not a competent leader make Keepthesoulalive Thursday #28

I think it's a case by case basis iemanja Yesterday #30

Older Democrats? sheshe2 Yesterday #40

Oh sure, pushing out sitting Dems instead of funding races against vulnerable rethugs... brush 17 hrs ago #59

A huge disappointment. The messaging is what the GOP eats up Nixie 18 hrs ago #50

So true. brush 17 hrs ago #58

I disagree sboatcar 18 hrs ago #53

Disagree all you want, but getting the majority is the priority or trump will continue... brush 17 hrs ago #57

Agreed ILikePie92 Thursday #9

(1) If others are doing the same, point them out. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #34

Excellent Points.. TY, W HAMILTON! Cha Yesterday #43

What the fuck is wrong with Mountainguy Yesterday #35

What is your definition of an "Institutionist Democrat"? sheshe2 Yesterday #42

Same as Establishment but being "anti-institutionist" isn't really a thing and doesn't have the groovy '60s betsuni 18 hrs ago #54

Primary out those that vote with trump, or who are silent in this fight for our democracy. Bravo. rich7862 18 hrs ago #51

Whataboutism at its very finest. GaYellowDawg 18 hrs ago #52

At $27 a-pop... fundraising can be very profitable. Oopsie Daisy Thursday #4

"I am once again asking you"... sheshe2 Yesterday #41

🤣😂👍️ Exactly! Oopsie Daisy 23 hrs ago #45

Looks like ILikePie92 Thursday #5

Oh ILikePie92 Thursday #7

See post #6. brush Thursday #10

Troubling nt delisen Thursday #8

Just put "the people" or "grassroots" in front of money and it's pure while everyone else's is a bribe from Satan. betsuni Thursday #11

Post removed Post removed Thursday #12

No it's not. Obama received a record amount of money from Wall Street. Did he refuse to sign betsuni Thursday #13

Is this the supposed reason he wants Democrats to stand up to fascism iemanja Thursday #14

Al Green stood up Keepthesoulalive Thursday #29

Obviously the point isn't to primary everyone. iemanja Yesterday #31

No I don't Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #37

Another grifter mcar Thursday #19

There was a video on here yesterday with Brian Tyler Cohen and David Hogg..A good question n answer Deuxcents Thursday #26

His PAC raised $11.9 million. $10.7 million went to "administrative expenses" mcar 17 hrs ago #60

I just get texts, not so much emails. ananda Thursday #20

Lot of people here sure hate David. Cuthbert Allgood Thursday #22

He seems to be good at dividing Dems MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #32

He is not the one dividing Democrats. Celerity 22 hrs ago #46

I'm confused these tax forms are from 2024 MagickMuffin Thursday #23

Isn't 2024 the most recent tax year? MichMan 19 hrs ago #48

The post said last month, last time I checked that would be Mar 2025 MagickMuffin 15 hrs ago #63

That post you are referring to is dated June 18 2024. MichMan 8 hrs ago #66

What does the DNC Chair position pay again? Genuinely curious. flvegan Thursday #24

Waiting for the pivot of his PAC's mission statement, from getting a variety of young Democrats into office, to... LudwigPastorius Thursday #25

If I knew that over 95% of donations to a PAC went to staff & overhead, and less than 5% was used for the stated purpose MichMan Thursday #27

it's quite a grift, to put it charitably fujiyamasan Yesterday #39

Donald Segretti had a term for people who set out to undermine Democrats. n/t valleyrogue Yesterday #33

Yes I learned of his salary from the pac about 2 weeks ago Meowmee Yesterday #36

Did you contribute to his PAC after receiving his passionate plea? MichMan 19 hrs ago #47

LOL no I deleted the emails and replied to one saying please remove me etc., and unsubbed etc. Meowmee 11 hrs ago #64

He's learned quick how to make money in politics. William769 23 hrs ago #44

Who is funding the PAC? JustAnotherGen 19 hrs ago #49

You are right, that is very important. JohnSJ 18 hrs ago #55

I guess that the technical term is 'suckers' Jose Garcia 17 hrs ago #61

This kid claudette 18 hrs ago #56

there are lots of jobs that require you... mike_c 16 hrs ago #62

It's pretty common among grifters. W_HAMILTON 11 hrs ago #65

Another greedy grifter. 😡 🤬nt Raine 2 hrs ago #67