General Discussion

Sewa

(1,407 posts)

3. So what! Do you think he's the only one?

Reply to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 06:29 PM

Thursday

Hogg has the Institutionist Dems running scared. Good for him.

Btw what’s wrong with giving Democratic voters more choice. Ultimately it comes down to the voters to decide, if they are given a choice of candidates.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates alarimer iemanja vanessa_ca Celerity SSJVegeta asm128

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Hogg is being paid a six figure salary by his PAC and may be using DNC emails to raise money for this PAC [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Thursday OP

he said he was gonna spend $20 mil but do not recall him providing the source of the money nt msongs Thursday #1

I believe the source is his pac Leaders We Deserve Meowmee Yesterday #38

A large salary, indeed. It looks to be three times the salary Nixie 2 hrs ago #68

Like "If you write a best-selling book, you can be a millionaire too" -- also complaining about Democrats! betsuni 2 hrs ago #69

Keep your eyes on the prize........... Lovie777 Thursday #2

So what! Do you think he's the only one? Sewa Thursday #3

I'll tell you what's wrong. Primarying sitting Dems with another Dem doesn't get us... brush Thursday #6

Refusing to do so gets the 2024 results iemanja Thursday #15

It's not that hard to understand. Subbing one Dem for annother gets us 2024 all over again. brush Thursday #16

Approval of Democrats is at an all-time low iemanja Thursday #17

Again, replacing Dems with other Dems does not gain the majority. brush Thursday #18

Is your point that it's a lost cause? iemanja Thursday #21

New blood does not a competent leader make Keepthesoulalive Thursday #28

I think it's a case by case basis iemanja Yesterday #30

Older Democrats? sheshe2 Yesterday #40

Oh sure, pushing out sitting Dems instead of funding races against vulnerable rethugs... brush 17 hrs ago #59

A huge disappointment. The messaging is what the GOP eats up Nixie 19 hrs ago #50

So true. brush 17 hrs ago #58

I disagree sboatcar 19 hrs ago #53

Disagree all you want, but getting the majority is the priority or trump will continue... brush 17 hrs ago #57

Agreed ILikePie92 Thursday #9

(1) If others are doing the same, point them out. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #34

Excellent Points.. TY, W HAMILTON! Cha Yesterday #43

What the fuck is wrong with Mountainguy Yesterday #35

What is your definition of an "Institutionist Democrat"? sheshe2 Yesterday #42

Same as Establishment but being "anti-institutionist" isn't really a thing and doesn't have the groovy '60s betsuni 18 hrs ago #54

Primary out those that vote with trump, or who are silent in this fight for our democracy. Bravo. rich7862 19 hrs ago #51

Whataboutism at its very finest. GaYellowDawg 19 hrs ago #52

At $27 a-pop... fundraising can be very profitable. Oopsie Daisy Thursday #4

"I am once again asking you"... sheshe2 Yesterday #41

🤣😂👍️ Exactly! Oopsie Daisy 23 hrs ago #45

Looks like ILikePie92 Thursday #5

Oh ILikePie92 Thursday #7

See post #6. brush Thursday #10

Troubling nt delisen Thursday #8

Just put "the people" or "grassroots" in front of money and it's pure while everyone else's is a bribe from Satan. betsuni Thursday #11

Post removed Post removed Thursday #12

No it's not. Obama received a record amount of money from Wall Street. Did he refuse to sign betsuni Thursday #13

Is this the supposed reason he wants Democrats to stand up to fascism iemanja Thursday #14

Al Green stood up Keepthesoulalive Thursday #29

Obviously the point isn't to primary everyone. iemanja Yesterday #31

No I don't Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #37

Another grifter mcar Thursday #19

There was a video on here yesterday with Brian Tyler Cohen and David Hogg..A good question n answer Deuxcents Thursday #26

His PAC raised $11.9 million. $10.7 million went to "administrative expenses" mcar 17 hrs ago #60

I just get texts, not so much emails. ananda Thursday #20

Lot of people here sure hate David. Cuthbert Allgood Thursday #22

He seems to be good at dividing Dems MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #32

He is not the one dividing Democrats. Celerity 22 hrs ago #46

I'm confused these tax forms are from 2024 MagickMuffin Thursday #23

Isn't 2024 the most recent tax year? MichMan 19 hrs ago #48

The post said last month, last time I checked that would be Mar 2025 MagickMuffin 15 hrs ago #63

That post you are referring to is dated June 18 2024. MichMan 8 hrs ago #66

What does the DNC Chair position pay again? Genuinely curious. flvegan Thursday #24

Waiting for the pivot of his PAC's mission statement, from getting a variety of young Democrats into office, to... LudwigPastorius Thursday #25

If I knew that over 95% of donations to a PAC went to staff & overhead, and less than 5% was used for the stated purpose MichMan Thursday #27

it's quite a grift, to put it charitably fujiyamasan Yesterday #39

Donald Segretti had a term for people who set out to undermine Democrats. n/t valleyrogue Yesterday #33

Yes I learned of his salary from the pac about 2 weeks ago Meowmee Yesterday #36

Did you contribute to his PAC after receiving his passionate plea? MichMan 19 hrs ago #47

LOL no I deleted the emails and replied to one saying please remove me etc., and unsubbed etc. Meowmee 11 hrs ago #64

He's learned quick how to make money in politics. William769 23 hrs ago #44

Who is funding the PAC? JustAnotherGen 19 hrs ago #49

You are right, that is very important. JohnSJ 18 hrs ago #55

I guess that the technical term is 'suckers' Jose Garcia 17 hrs ago #61

This kid claudette 18 hrs ago #56

there are lots of jobs that require you... mike_c 16 hrs ago #62

It's pretty common among grifters. W_HAMILTON 11 hrs ago #65

Another greedy grifter. 😡 🤬nt Raine 3 hrs ago #67