Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

(2,493 posts)

2. Doesn't that just lead to the conclusion

Sun Apr 24, 2016, 01:59 PM

Apr 2016

That the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, for any reason?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this a logical interpretation of the Second Amendment? [View all] YoungDemCA Apr 2016 OP

Yep Mike__M Apr 2016 #1

Doesn't that just lead to the conclusion TeddyR Apr 2016 #2

Adding a word that billh58 Apr 2016 #3

THREE Commas. lastlib Apr 2016 #5

Improper use of punctuation can drastically alter meaning, indeed. Electric Monk Apr 2016 #6

The 2nd is a right of the states Buzz cook Apr 2016 #4

2ndA historical context? jimmy the one Apr 2016 #7

Gun Nuts just can't help themselves billh58 Apr 2016 #10