Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,082 posts)
2. Not alone, though not "af"
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 10:53 PM
Jun 25

In a similar vein, modern lazy thinking english is to use "less" everywhere, including those situations where "fewer" is appropriate. Likewise "amount" where "number" is appropriate.

Lazy thinking english:
There were less people at the meeting.
There was a large amount of people succeeding.

Thoughtful english:
There were fewer people at the meeting.
There was a large number of people succeeding.
There were many people succeeding.
There were many more people succeeding this year.

People are countable so "fewer", "number", and "many" apply. Matter is uncountable though measurable, so "less", "amount", and "much" apply.

The apple had less mass than the watermelon.
The amount of sand was the same as the amount of sugar.
There was much more oil than vinegar.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»For first time, Webb tele...»Reply #2