Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

4. i am not talking about the mere choice of clothes. i am talking about a society

Reply to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #3)

Fri Jan 13, 2012, 08:30 AM

Jan 2012

that is fixated in control of woman thru covering her from head to toe, truly focused on all powerful male sexuality or pornifying women. both cases dehumanizing the women.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Mosby Jan 2012 OP

strip them naked, cover them from head to toe. extremes. with the same results. seabeyond Jan 2012 #1

i think there is a difference La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2012 #3

i am not talking about the mere choice of clothes. i am talking about a society seabeyond Jan 2012 #4

one form of control is beyond the ability of women to resist La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2012 #5

ok. with the same, end, result. they both hurt women. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #6

the end is nowhere near the same La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2012 #10

as are you, ignoring many many reason there are substantial difference beyond religion. seabeyond Jan 2012 #11

I have found that women are treated as sexual objects tabatha Jan 2012 #2

How is that a flipside? redqueen Jan 2012 #7

"Summarize the concept of objectificaton" Lisa D Jan 2012 #8

That's the $64,000 question. redqueen Jan 2012 #9