Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Poverty

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(50,644 posts)
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 02:27 PM Oct 2012

Putting a Face on Welfare Spat [View all]

By LOUISE RADNOFSKY

WSJ 10/30/12

MINNEAPOLIS—Latisha Cunningham, an unemployed 30-year-old, carries an activity log in her pink backpack so she can document every hour she spends in temporary work, looking for jobs or at community college. If she is missing signatures from a teacher or doesn't have the right mix of activities, she could lose the $437 a month she receives in cash assistance. If the state doesn't have the right documentation for her, it could lose federal funding for its welfare program. Counselors say that assembling the paperwork is so time-consuming that helping her land permanent employment takes a back seat to perfecting her time sheet.

(snip)

Officials in the human services department of Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, informally asked the federal Department of Health and Human Services earlier this year if they could be judged by a new measure, such as the number of people the state helped become self-supporting. Two states with Republican governors—Nevada and Utah—also expressed interest in having more flexibility.

In July, the Obama administration offered all governors the chance to seek waivers. That prompted an outcry from Republican lawmakers, who called the move a veiled attempt to weaken the program's goal of moving people off welfare. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney aired television ads accusing President Barack Obama of gutting the work requirement. The fight has deterred any state from formally seeking a waiver.

(snip)

Still, federal officials said that, despite initial interest, no states have sought a waiver. Lucinda Jesson, Minnesota's commissioner of human services, said she thought "long and hard" about applying but decided against it. "I just didn't think getting in the middle of a political firestorm helped move our policy forward," she said.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204789304578084803747484608.html

(If you cannot access the story from the link, try copy the title onto google)


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putting a Face on Welfare Spat [View all] question everything Oct 2012 OP
Yes, the rules are mond-boggling oysterbay Apr 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»Putting a Face on Welfare...»Reply #0