Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. Well, the proposed law was a change to an existing law that was on the books and unenforced.
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 06:38 PM
Jun 2012

It changed the swearing from a criminal offense (yes, really) to an offense that merited a fine.

It came up because some busybody got mad about kids swearing on her street, loudly.

She should have had the cops come by and bag the little farts for disorderly conduct, rather than going down this road.

Laws that try to limit speech are what makes municipalities a "laughingstock." The law has to jump through a few hoops in order to be enforceable, yet--I think it might not make it through the scrutiny. What's a swear? Hell? So if you quote "Hell hath no fury..." you could be fined? Damn? Let's not worry about those torpedoes, and full speed ahead!

I think defending free speech is a worthwhile thing, even if--really, especially if--the speech is not to one's liking. It's easy to cheerlead for stuff one likes, harder to support a principle when the particular action is a bit noxious.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»We Know Why We're F**king...»Reply #4