Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(22,493 posts)
2. Well, did you get one? Oh aren't you an Olympus person?
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 07:51 PM
Wednesday

Just some thoughts.

1. I don't go for high speed lenses. We're not using film any more (well, I do on the side).
You can kick up the ISO a fair amount to gain sharpness from higher shutter speed and not get "grainy" with a good sensor.

2. From the DPR site:

the samples we've taken so far suggest it exhibits quite significant vignetting, as you open the aperture up. The lens also requires the use of distortion correction as part of its design.


Taming these optically (and not just in software) costs money in the design and optics. I don't know how well software "undoes" these defects.

I won't ramble. That must be the reason it's inexpensive.

Ken Rockwell review here: https://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/lenses/45mm-f12.htm
In this case, less info is more, I think. Too many charts and graphs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Canon's latest F1.2 lens ...»Reply #2