Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Israeli military launches attack on Gaza, Israeli media reports [View all]Mossfern
(4,524 posts)33. Treatment of Jews in pre- Israeli Palestine
Bulletin de lAlliance israélite universelle, year 1910.
The Jewish condition in Muslim societies is governed by the dhimma, which institutes the status of dhimmi for Christians and Jews. A dhimmi is a protected person (this is the meaning of the word in Arabic), and as such is an inferior and submissive subject, restrained by a host of discriminatory and fiscal measures. According to historians specialized in Islam, Janine and Dominique Sourdel, dhimma is based primarily on a verse of the Koran: Fight those who do not believe in God or the Last Day, who do not declare unlawful what God and His Messenger have declared unlawful, who do not practice the religion of Truth, among the holders of Scripture, until they pay the jizya, in compensation for this benefit and because of their inferiority (Koran, IX, 29). As a result, note the two authors of the A Glossary of Islam, a two-tier society was created: on the one hand, the level of the masters, distinguished above all by their membership of Islam, and on the other, the level of non-Muslims, who did not enjoy the same rights2. This society carried within it the seeds of intolerance which were to characterize, in every era and in every region, the rigorist Muslim states confronted with the problem of religious minorities3.
In the nineteenth century, a great many accounts of Jewish life in Arab-Muslim lands reveal a condition characterized primarily by contempt. In 1910, a Western traveler to Yemen4 wrote: The Jew is the beast on whom one beats at any time, for no reason, to calm ones nerves, to appease ones anger. Between Jews and Arab-Muslims, coexistence is fragile, and remains at the mercy of the slightest incident, especially when Jews forget what Muslim society calls their sense of humility. Codified violence keeps everyone in their place, at the risk of being accompanied by the spilling of blood.
Based on a study of the archives of Islamic courts in Palestine, Israeli historian Amnon Cohen reconstructs the reality of the condition of Jewish dhimmis before the beginnings of Zionism, based on legal and administrative sources spanning almost six hundred years, from the Prophet to Saladin in the XIIth century. These documents attest to the fact that the so-called Pact of Umar, i.e. the codification of the dhimma, had retained for many generations an indisputable character. However, contrary to its official name, the Pact of Umar is not a treaty signed between two parties. It was not the subject of negotiation, but a constraint exerted on subjugated populations.
https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/pogroms-in-palestine-before-the-creation-of-the-state-of-israel-1830-1948/
Less than 4 paragraphs
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As long as Palestinians exist in their homeland the chance for anything resembling peace* is zero.
AloeVera
Oct 19
#3
Israelis existed in Palestine for hundreds of years before the Zionists came from Europe.
LiberalArkie
Oct 19
#17
Yes indeed. And everyone was relatively peaceful until the Balfour Declaration.
LiberalArkie
Oct 19
#28
Terror operatives fired RPGs at Israeli troops in Rafah today, says IDF, prompting airstrikes
Glorious bastard
Oct 19
#4
It was great the hostages were returned, but the impression I got from much of the media was that
Fil1957
Oct 19
#18
I'm 90% sure that the apricothellbeast is more hated then Shrub Bush was in 2003-2009
irisblue
Oct 19
#21
The last thing I would do is defend Hamas or any such group that launches terrorist attacks and takes hostages
fujiyamasan
Oct 19
#49
And yet, two years ago, being evil and stupid, they attacked without having hostages as bargaining chips.
Glorious bastard
Oct 20
#59