Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Paramount to Pay Trump $16 Million to Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(166,622 posts)31. Maddow Blog-Paramount to pay $16 million to settle with Trump in CBS News '60 Minutes' lawsui
The question was less about whether Paramount would settle with Trump, and more about how much his lawyers would accept.
Paramount executives were worried it might look like they were bribing Trump by giving him millions of dollars to settle a baseless lawsuit based on a bizarre conspiracy theory.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-07-02T12:17:20.550Z
Now that the settlement is official, they were right to be concerned. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/paramount-settles-trump-cbs-news-60-minutes-lawsuit-rcna203667
After months of legal negotiations and wrangling, the question was less about whether Paramount would settle with Donald Trump, and more about how much the presidents lawyers would agree to. As NBC News reported, that question now has an answer.
The company did not apologize as part of the deal or admit any fault. Nevertheless, the plaintiff wasted little time in gloating: In a written statement from a presidential spokesperson, Team Trump boasted that the settlement holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit......
In fact, The Wall Street Journal reported last week, Over the past few months, Paramount leaders have been wrestling with how to pay to settle the lawsuit without exposing directors and officers to liability in potential future shareholder litigation or to criminal charges for bribing a public official.
This dynamic was not lost on Capitol Hill observers. Paramount appears to be trying to settle a lawsuit that it has assessed as completely without merit, Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden said in a recent letter to Chairwoman Shari Redstone. Under the federal bribery statute, it is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act. If Paramount officials make these concessions in a quid pro quo arrangement to influence President Trump or other Administration officials, they may be breaking the law.
Now that the settlement is official, and Paramount is paying Team Trump to settle a case that appears baseless, its likely these questions are poised to grow considerably louder.
This ongoing debacle has already cost the network over the last couple of months, the head of CBS News and the executive producer of 60 Minutes have both stepped down and those costs now also include a steep price tag.
Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump that had alleged an interview that aired on CBSs 60 Minutes last year with Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent for the presidency, was deceptively edited. The agreement in principle, proposed by a mediator, includes plaintiffs fees and costs and except for fees and costs will be allocated to Trumps future presidential library, Paramount Global said in a statement late Tuesday.
The company did not apologize as part of the deal or admit any fault. Nevertheless, the plaintiff wasted little time in gloating: In a written statement from a presidential spokesperson, Team Trump boasted that the settlement holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit......
In fact, The Wall Street Journal reported last week, Over the past few months, Paramount leaders have been wrestling with how to pay to settle the lawsuit without exposing directors and officers to liability in potential future shareholder litigation or to criminal charges for bribing a public official.
This dynamic was not lost on Capitol Hill observers. Paramount appears to be trying to settle a lawsuit that it has assessed as completely without merit, Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden said in a recent letter to Chairwoman Shari Redstone. Under the federal bribery statute, it is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act. If Paramount officials make these concessions in a quid pro quo arrangement to influence President Trump or other Administration officials, they may be breaking the law.
Now that the settlement is official, and Paramount is paying Team Trump to settle a case that appears baseless, its likely these questions are poised to grow considerably louder.
This ongoing debacle has already cost the network over the last couple of months, the head of CBS News and the executive producer of 60 Minutes have both stepped down and those costs now also include a steep price tag.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Paramount to Pay Trump $16 Million to Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2
OP
Trump will punish the media when they give honest, fair, positive coverage of liberals.
Irish_Dem
Jul 2
#3
While you want them to fight back, it does make sense to settle what is, essentially, a nuisance claim.
Vinca
Jul 2
#14
If my math is correct, its 57 ten thousandths of one percent of the value of the merger
onenote
Jul 2
#18
All so what's her face, the woman who owns, or is majority owner in, Paramount can...
the nelm
Jul 2
#25
Maddow Blog-Paramount to pay $16 million to settle with Trump in CBS News '60 Minutes' lawsui
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2
#31