Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(3,395 posts)
21. Multiple parties won't work in our current system.
Sun Jun 8, 2025, 11:33 AM
Jun 8

They work in parliamentary systems, but unless one party secures a majority, they have to form coalitions, and when the coalitions collapse, the government falls.

Third parties in the US are often staunchly opposed to the party with which they're most similar. Ask any Green Party supporter in the US if they'd cooperate with the Democratic Party, and you'll get a vigorous "no." They won't form coalitions with other parties. Thus, they act as spoilers.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They head up their ass party. HUTA Walleye Jun 8 #1
The "Forgot to Flush Party" was the first thing I thought. hunter Jun 8 #15
Yang again? How many times has he been rejected by voters now? brush Jun 8 #2
I can see Musk creating Dem4life1970 Jun 8 #19
Hiel Hitler salutes and all. And Yang won't object as long as he gets the attention he seeks. brush Jun 8 #35
very busy Be Leave On Jun 8 #37
Fuck both of them Sanity Claws Jun 8 #3
Here we fucking go again. This is why we can't have nice things anymore: third parties. Vinca Jun 8 #4
Nothing wrong with 3rd parties. Jirel Jun 8 #6
3rd parties do not work in a closed two party system wwith winner takes all elections. Force runoffs in ... marble falls Jun 8 #7
That's what many people don't understand PSPS Jun 8 #17
third-partier is just a political life phase cadoman Jun 8 #25
Automatic ranked voting run offs is another way that can works for this Tom Rinaldo Jun 8 #24
Third parties Cirsium Jun 8 #27
The first three weren't third parties. carpetbagger Jun 8 #29
Hair splitting maybe? Cirsium Jun 8 #31
Probably hair splitting. But... carpetbagger Jun 8 #40
I know the history Cirsium Jun 9 #43
We're not a parliamentary system like other countries. That's why 3rd parties screw up the works. I don't think Vinca Jun 8 #18
In the United States, we build our coalitions before the general election Gore1FL Jun 8 #20
That's actually a pretty good way to look at it. Lucky Luciano Jun 8 #22
Multiple parties won't work in our current system. cab67 Jun 8 #21
Third parties have never won the presidency in the u.s. ThreeNoSeep Jun 8 #32
I go with option 2. LisaM Jun 8 #33
Oh. ThreeNoSeep Tuesday #45
Well, I probably use the term loosely, but... LisaM Tuesday #46
I hear you ThreeNoSeep Wednesday #47
What a loser. Jirel Jun 8 #5
Battle lines are being drawn nt Javaman Jun 8 #8
The Nader Fallacy William Seger Jun 8 #9
Yang "believes the Tesla CEO has what it takes" genxlib Jun 8 #10
E-Loon is a sociopath wolfie001 Jun 8 #12
Does he want to pick off Dem voters and help the fascists too? wolfie001 Jun 8 #11
Musk is a 'political outsider' like Leonard Leo and the Koch Brothers ToxMarz Jun 8 #13
Not this jerk again... travelingthrulife Jun 8 #14
Oh...such a winning combo..... PortTack Jun 8 #16
Gag me with a spoon. Martin68 Jun 8 #23
The Techbro Micropenis Party? n/t CousinIT Jun 8 #26
Call it the "Wealthy Tech bro party" Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 8 #28
A few possible names Icanthinkformyself Jun 8 #30
Remember this guy? BumRushDaShow Jun 8 #34
I didn't know Yang was a moron. Now I do. hay rick Jun 8 #36
Fuck these tech bros. They always think they are the smartest in the room, when they don't know jack shit. SunSeeker Jun 8 #38
This will be DOA - Musk is Radioactive in Politics NEOBuckeye Jun 8 #39
Agree. I thought Yang was smarter than this MadameButterfly Jun 8 #41
Not just no, but Heil No Hekate Jun 9 #42
Really?! Oh, geeeebz... Go Away, dude! electric_blue68 Jun 9 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Andrew Yang reaches out t...»Reply #21