General Discussion

samsingh

(18,070 posts)

16. agreed

Reply to newdeal2 (Reply #10)

Sat Jun 14, 2025, 12:50 AM

Yesterday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

At some point Democrats are going to get back in control of the Presidency [View all] samsingh Friday OP

Okay flvegan Friday #1

we actually need to do something samsingh Yesterday #13

Yeah, like that guy Garland. He really made them pay. nt LexVegas Friday #2

exactly - he should never have been put in that role samsingh Yesterday #12

Garland was utterly weak... our next President won't make that mistake again!! InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #28

The issue is we will not attack their senators because that who they are, not who we are. CincyDem Friday #3

SOME Democrat who plans on running in the primary needs to start talking like this. RockRaven Friday #4

2028 is our last chance before the post-2030 census redistricting likely slams the EC map to the RW's favour Celerity Friday #5

The terms "high road" and "low road" imply a kind of false symmetry. harumph Friday #6

More shitting on Democrats and naysaying Oopsie Daisy Friday #7

seriously? We have lost the house, the Senate, and the Presidency (to a convicted Felon) samsingh Yesterday #14

Here's a lesson for you. The more people denigrate and shit on Democrats * Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #22

trump just said: Trump Said Padilla Deserved to Be Handcuffed Because He Looked Like an Illegal samsingh Yesterday #24

Sorry. I will not play that game. I will not justify the wholesale shitting on Democrats * Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #25

Demanding that our leaders be leaders is NOT "wholesale shitting on Democrats." InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #29

Sorry. Hissy fits and other performative grandstanding should not be confused with actual "leadership." Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #35

Is it possible you're confusing the passion of certain leaders with "throwing a hissy fit"?! InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #38

No, that's not what I'm saying. Read what I wrote again. Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #39

Okay, I get what you're sayin, tho I disagree somewhat... sorry for the misunderstanding. InAbLuEsTaTe 21 hrs ago #40

can't be spending time reveling stillcool Yesterday #26

They already understand this possibility, so no Democrat can ever be president again 0rganism Friday #8

Agree, they are working overtime to ensure no Democrat can ever be elected President again LR3 Friday #11

if 10 million Democrats had voted for Kamala - who was the better candidate samsingh Yesterday #15

If wishes were horses... 0rganism Yesterday #19

I thought it was- if wishes were snitches... JanMichael Yesterday #30

We abso-fuckin-lutely CAN win the next time...just put up a female minority candidate who's a progressive populist InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #31

And if a certain representative had not encouraged her constituents to vote for "Uncommitted" & NOT support Democrats * Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #37

There's the follow-on question of what serious person would want to be the leader of a newly pariahed Hugin Yesterday #20

I doubt today's Republicans ever plan for a Democrat to win the presidency again. Lonestarblue Friday #9

It's also our members in our own party sometimes newdeal2 Friday #10

agreed samsingh Yesterday #16

Not unless we do more than click our tongues at their vote stealing and suppression efforts. lees1975 Yesterday #17

This! halobeam Yesterday #21

YESSS!! All we need to do is FIGHT for what we know is right!! InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #33

Look at our approval rating right now Greg_In_SF Yesterday #18

we are not reaching the voters samsingh Yesterday #23

No we are not... it's really not that hard either!! InAbLuEsTaTe Yesterday #36

YES, and make sure that Garland is no where to be found or heard from. I never want this worthless POS around SWBTATTReg Yesterday #27

Maybe as a SC Justice appointment? JanMichael Yesterday #32

2008 Delarage Yesterday #34