General Discussion

hlthe2b

(110,319 posts) Thu Jun 12, 2025, 06:58 PM Jun 12

156

Breaking/Updated: Judge releases ruling Returning National Guard OVERSIGHT to NEWSOM Tomorrow [View all]

Last edited Thu Jun 12, 2025, 09:13 PM - Edit history (3)

https://apnews.com/article/california-immigration-national-guard-newsom-trump-lawsuit-aedf8cdd95ee899c9559d5e54a2e4833

A federal judge said Thursday that he plans to rule quickly on whether President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by deploying the California National Guard in Los Angeles against the governor’s wishes.

“This country was founded in response to a monarch, and the Constitution is a document of limitations. I’m trying to figure out where the lines are drawn,” U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said before a packed courtroom.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has characterized the federal military intervention in the nation’s second largest city as the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation’s democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that, saying the troop deployment was unnecessary and meant to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city’s large immigrant population.

***The title UPDATES, but the decision link follows (thank you pnwmom).***
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70496361/64/newsom-v-trump/

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

**Breaking/Updated: Judge releases ruling Returning National Guard OVERSIGHT to NEWSOM Tomorrow** [View all] hlthe2b Jun 12 OP

Kick SheltieLover Jun 12 #1

Judge said ruling on the marines is beyond his scope. Wonder what the process is for that. Amaryllis Jun 12 #2

Yeah. EndlessWire Jun 12 #3

If Krasnov JustAnotherGen Jun 12 #5

I can only hope DENVERPOPS Jun 12 #6

If the shooting starts, the looting starts, IN EARNEST--- not this penny-ante stuff Jack Valentino Jun 12 #19

I don't think it is looting JustAnotherGen Jun 13 #22

exactly what came to me yesterday, when I read about this case scheduled for a ruling. msfiddlestix Jun 13 #23

the question then is, will they follow unconstitutional orders? nt Javaman Jun 13 #25

The Coast Guard doesn't fall under that act because we are currently under the Department of Homeland Security and LT Barclay Jun 12 #18

TY! n/t EndlessWire Jun 13 #21

Coast Guard Normanart Jun 13 #24

And some of their OLD ships are still there Attilatheblond Jun 13 #26

We still get a lot of hand me downs. LT Barclay Jun 13 #29

Nobody puts transport planes to better use that the USCG, in my opinion Attilatheblond Jun 13 #31

We have deployed in every major conflict for 2 reasons: LT Barclay Jun 13 #27

And when the USS Constitution needs to be turned twice a year, who ya gonna call? Attilatheblond Jun 13 #32

Didn't know that. Thanks! LT Barclay Saturday #35

Is it because Coast Guard falls under Homeland Security? woodsprite Jun 13 #28

Can't remember what year is was when Homeland got the CG. Attilatheblond Jun 13 #33

Don't forget MW67 Jun 12 #4

Here's the actual ruling. pnwmom Jun 12 #7

Thank you, pnwmom... I'll add it to the original post... hlthe2b Jun 12 #10

Interesting but irrelevant - the judge in this case (Charles Breyer) is the brother of former SCOTUS Justice Stephen Bre TheRickles Jun 12 #8

Trump will issue a scathing attack on him newdeal2 Jun 12 #15

**Updated above with overview of decision but looking for a linked summary** hlthe2b Jun 12 #9

Watch what the Supreme Court does 😑 In It to Win It Jun 12 #11

I'm glad to hear he's going to rule quickly... slightlv Jun 12 #12

Nope... There were NO OFFFICIAL ORDERS ISSUED. Thus, nothing these NG are doing is legal, they won't be paid hlthe2b Jun 12 #14

"Vigilante justice" ?? Jack Valentino Jun 12 #20

Now bdamomma Jun 12 #13

See my post above. The NG has no choice unless another court intercedes.. hlthe2b Jun 12 #16

if the guard refuses their commanders can be brought up on state charges moonshinegnomie Jun 12 #17

If there is no longer any law that will hold stillcool Jun 13 #30

The decision has been blocked by the 9th circuit temporarily DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 13 #34