Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greta Thunberg after landing in Paris [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(25,114 posts)53. What's going on in Gaza is very, very much a climate crisis issue.
From an article more than a year old: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/09/emissions-gaza-israel-hamas-war-climate-change
The planet-warming emissions generated during the first two months of the war in Gaza were greater than the annual carbon footprint of more than 20 of the worlds most climate-vulnerable nations, new research reveals.
The vast majority (over 99%) of the 281,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2 equivalent) estimated to have been generated in the first 60 days following the 7 October Hamas attack can be attributed to Israels aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza, according to a first-of-its-kind analysis by researchers in the UK and US.
According to the study, which is based on only a handful of carbon-intensive activities and is therefore probably a significant underestimate, the climate cost of the first 60 days of Israels military response was equivalent to burning at least 150,000 tonnes of coal.
The analysis, which is yet to be peer reviewed, includes CO2 from aircraft missions, tanks and fuel from other vehicles, as well as emissions generated by making and exploding the bombs, artillery and rockets. It does not include other planet-warming gases such as methane. Almost half the total CO2 emissions were down to US cargo planes flying military supplies to Israel.
The vast majority (over 99%) of the 281,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2 equivalent) estimated to have been generated in the first 60 days following the 7 October Hamas attack can be attributed to Israels aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza, according to a first-of-its-kind analysis by researchers in the UK and US.
According to the study, which is based on only a handful of carbon-intensive activities and is therefore probably a significant underestimate, the climate cost of the first 60 days of Israels military response was equivalent to burning at least 150,000 tonnes of coal.
The analysis, which is yet to be peer reviewed, includes CO2 from aircraft missions, tanks and fuel from other vehicles, as well as emissions generated by making and exploding the bombs, artillery and rockets. It does not include other planet-warming gases such as methane. Almost half the total CO2 emissions were down to US cargo planes flying military supplies to Israel.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Me too. Despite not fulfilling a relief mission, she exposed Israel and its continuing international crimes.
Gore1FL
Jun 10
#4
It might have helped if Hamas didn't START THE WAR by attacking Jewish population first
Stargazer99
Jun 10
#6
Both sides suck tremendously, to be sure. In this particular situation, Israel was the lawbreaker. nt
Gore1FL
Jun 10
#21
palestinians have been trying to remove hamas too. its iran interference. outside support.
pansypoo53219
Jun 10
#22
I could see 'Nut and Yahoo' turning to russia and chyna and north korea for support
wolfie001
Jun 10
#36
Thank you. And I can't help but wonder why/how/when is she an authority on anything and everything?
Oopsie Daisy
Jun 10
#48
Wow - i salute anyone putting their life on the line bringing attention to this genocide
womanofthehills
Jun 10
#49
She wasn't disturbing the peace. She was disturbing the war crimes. The war criminals saw her as dangerous.
Ping Tung
Jun 10
#9
I can't think of anyone on the left who supports Netanyahu or the Isreale right wing
Mossfern
Wednesday
#91
And to counter that chaos and destruction, we could all use a bit more bliss in the world.
TheRickles
Jun 10
#79
Nice to see that it isn't just deranged right-wing hacks jumping on the Greta hate bandwagon
Rob H.
Jun 10
#18
The Michigan Muslims who voted for Trump are the ones who threw Muslims under the bus. nt
SunSeeker
Jun 10
#45
Between this protest and the protest against ICE, I'm reminded that people love to project onto anyone who takes action.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 10
#26
She has in the past, and has since said it has become for her an issue of broader justice.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 10
#66
Hamas could end the bloodshed today by surrendering, and releasing the hostages/bodies it is holding.
SunSeeker
Jun 10
#64
Accused by Israel while providing no proof for it and 1 memeber of Parliment said it, one who's twitter page
Eko
Jun 10
#55
His name was removed from terrorist list and he received damages back in 2021. That this is
Nanjeanne
Wednesday
#92