General Discussion

intrepidity

(8,302 posts)

43. You're saying a suit needed to be filed to .... what?

Reply to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #41)

Mon Jun 9, 2025, 08:29 PM

Monday

Prove that the law existed or was violated?

Seems you might amend your post #11.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guard call up is invalid- they can be held personally responsible. [View all] James48 Monday OP

Will TACO taco or will he pardon all the troops, or will he double down? Get popcorn out! marble falls Monday #1

Double Down JustAnotherGen Tuesday #48

Gavin needs to communicate this directly to those soldiers. Javaman Monday #2

I recommend the protestors print that and hand them out to the National Guards. Doodley Monday #3

I recommend blunt-nosed paper airplanes HariSeldon Monday #14

Love it! FailureToCommunicate Monday #24

Oh dude, you have no idea jmowreader Tuesday #60

Yes! If only they could be dropped from upper story windows, like confetti parades. FailureToCommunicate Monday #23

I doubt this matters, since when have laws stopped Trump? dem4decades Monday #4

He is losing lots of court cases MadameButterfly Monday #33

I think the goal is to let the Guardspeople know--they don't have spooky3 Monday #5

So far, I've only seen LA police roughing up anyone. In fact, other than National Guard around detention center, not Silent Type Monday #6

and I doubt they WILL do much of anything. There's hardly any protest. No rioting. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #50

The convict doubled down even worst by calling up Marines, active duty troops... brush Monday #7

The Insurrection Act of 1807 applies here Kaleva Monday #18

What insurrection? LearnedHand Tuesday #52

Here Kaleva Tuesday #59

I'm aware of the Act, but there was no insurrection LearnedHand Tuesday #61

They used the Act to do what they did so it is applicable Kaleva Tuesday #62

A friend was an officer in the Army in Vietnam. He was ordered to go into Cambodia, armed with a camera and surfered Monday #8

If they are smart (Which I believe they are) HarryM Monday #9

Charge who? For what? reACTIONary Monday #10

Clearly, you are mistaken Fiendish Thingy Monday #11

Thank you, although if past is prologue on DU, this misinfo OP will rack up 100+ recs. Celerity Monday #13

A lie travels around the world... Fiendish Thingy Monday #15

as predicted, 122 recs and counting Celerity Monday #27

+1 Kaleva Monday #17

Why "clearly." The OP clearly infers Newsom's likely position; so what if it doesn't mention Newsom. You're ancianita Monday #19

It's not a strawman argument Fiendish Thingy Monday #22

It is you that are clearly mistaken. W_HAMILTON Monday #40

Indeed, that is the law quoted in Newsom's suit Fiendish Thingy Monday #41

You're saying a suit needed to be filed to .... what? intrepidity Monday #43

The suit *alleges* that particular law was violated Fiendish Thingy Monday #46

I'm confused Bluesaph Tuesday #47

The governor doesnt sign off DetroitLegalBeagle Tuesday #51

Was that done? Did they follow the procedure? Bluesaph Tuesday #58

So if not properly activated, they are held personally accountable? Would they then be held on Scalded Nun Monday #12

False. nt LexVegas Monday #16

Gavin seems to be growing a pair. He can throw down the gauntlet and have the CA Guard commander flashman13 Monday #20

Trump Mblaze Monday #21

Or something like that. intrepidity Monday #44

"My evidence refuting the OP's claim is that Newsom (and the AG, and other legal experts) have not made this claim.)..." ancianita Monday #25

I didn't "call out people's facts as opinions" Fiendish Thingy Monday #42

Grabber Blue Ozarks Monday #26

Before the Civil War, that was correct Polybius Monday #28

NYTimes had an article on it yesterday - TBF Monday #29

I have a paywall remover link Polybius Monday #30

The question is intrepidity Monday #45

In that case it looks like LBJ was trying to protect marchers - TBF Tuesday #54

This is not accurate! It's dangerous misinformation. Please edit/remove. LauraInLA Monday #31

Are you not aware that Trump federalized this shit specifically so he could do this? Because it sure sounds like it. Karasu Monday #32

Prosecute them all. Moostache Monday #34

arrest them under state law moonshinegnomie Monday #35

All nice but who's doing anything about it? Firestorm49 Monday #36

Does California need to build it's own military Fullduplexxx Monday #37

They already have one basically DetroitLegalBeagle Tuesday #57

Wikipedia is your friend... progressoid Monday #38

Guest on Nicolle Wallace said the same thing. Katinfl Monday #39

And will the remedy be remedied? William769 Tuesday #49

How does the fed have authority to send NG troops to Iraq? JohnnyRingo Tuesday #53

Title 10 DetroitLegalBeagle Tuesday #56

Thank You. JohnnyRingo Wednesday #63

K&R bdamomma Tuesday #55

Here is the Court Pinion calling it a violation of the Comstitution: James48 5 hrs ago #64

It's already been reversed on appeal. GaYellowDawg 5 hrs ago #65

NO it hasn't. James48 2 hrs ago #66

Well, I'm glad, then GaYellowDawg 2 hrs ago #67

What would happen if Newsom ordered his guard to STAY PUT bluestarone 2 hrs ago #68