Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm referencing a post on discrepancies in 2024 election, and we need to do better ensuring acurate mid-term results (Original Post) NowsTheTime Yesterday OP
A bit more. usonian Yesterday #1
Here is a link to the lawsuit... ultralite001 Yesterday #2

usonian

(18,242 posts)
1. A bit more.
Thu Jun 12, 2025, 02:23 PM
Yesterday

In addition to the economictimes article (quote below), LymphocyteLover posted this link, to essentially the same article:
https://dailyboulder.com/report-voting-machines-were-altered-before-the-2024-election-did-kamala-harris-actually-win/

quote from the first:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/kamala-harris-won-the-u-s-elections-bombshell-report-claims-voting-machines-were-tampered-with-before-2024/articleshow/121732679.cms


According to the investigative piece from Daily Boulder, a private lab quietly implemented sweeping changes to voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties ahead of the 2024 race. Those changes, the report claims, were made with no public notice, no formal testing, and no third-party oversight.


What changes were made to voting machines before the 2024 election?
The report centers around Pro V&V, a federally accredited lab responsible for certifying voting machines in key states like Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, and California. In early 2024, the lab reportedly approved updates to ES&S voting systems, which included:

* New ballot scanners

* Printer reconfigurations

* Firmware upgrades

* A new Electionware reporting system


Instead of labeling these as major changes, Pro V&V classified them as “de minimis,” a term typically reserved for insignificant tweaks. This classification allowed them to bypass public scrutiny and avoid triggering full-scale testing or certification processes.

ultralite001

(1,768 posts)
2. Here is a link to the lawsuit...
Thu Jun 12, 2025, 02:48 PM
Yesterday
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=5E1/Fc_PLUS_rWASPlhLKP7dKOQ==

Here's more from SMART Elections:

https://smartelections.us/home

Information about "algorithms" + rigging the vote... from Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2:20-cv-01771...
w/ info about Pro V & V...

https://ia801709.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.1.21.pdf

Additional details are also noted here:

https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before

It's helpful to have all this information in one place. Thanks...
Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»I'm referencing a post on...