Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Way Forward
Related: About this forumI'm referencing a post on discrepancies in 2024 election, and we need to do better ensuring acurate mid-term results
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016406634
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

I'm referencing a post on discrepancies in 2024 election, and we need to do better ensuring acurate mid-term results (Original Post)
NowsTheTime
Yesterday
OP
usonian
(18,242 posts)1. A bit more.
In addition to the economictimes article (quote below), LymphocyteLover posted this link, to essentially the same article:
https://dailyboulder.com/report-voting-machines-were-altered-before-the-2024-election-did-kamala-harris-actually-win/
quote from the first:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/kamala-harris-won-the-u-s-elections-bombshell-report-claims-voting-machines-were-tampered-with-before-2024/articleshow/121732679.cms
According to the investigative piece from Daily Boulder, a private lab quietly implemented sweeping changes to voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties ahead of the 2024 race. Those changes, the report claims, were made with no public notice, no formal testing, and no third-party oversight.
What changes were made to voting machines before the 2024 election?
The report centers around Pro V&V, a federally accredited lab responsible for certifying voting machines in key states like Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, and California. In early 2024, the lab reportedly approved updates to ES&S voting systems, which included:
* New ballot scanners
* Printer reconfigurations
* Firmware upgrades
* A new Electionware reporting system
Instead of labeling these as major changes, Pro V&V classified them as de minimis, a term typically reserved for insignificant tweaks. This classification allowed them to bypass public scrutiny and avoid triggering full-scale testing or certification processes.
ultralite001
(1,768 posts)2. Here is a link to the lawsuit...
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=5E1/Fc_PLUS_rWASPlhLKP7dKOQ==
Here's more from SMART Elections:
https://smartelections.us/home
Information about "algorithms" + rigging the vote... from Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2:20-cv-01771...
w/ info about Pro V & V...
https://ia801709.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.1.21.pdf
Additional details are also noted here:
https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before
It's helpful to have all this information in one place. Thanks...
Here's more from SMART Elections:
https://smartelections.us/home
Information about "algorithms" + rigging the vote... from Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2:20-cv-01771...
w/ info about Pro V & V...
https://ia801709.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.1.21.pdf
Additional details are also noted here:
https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before
It's helpful to have all this information in one place. Thanks...