Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George McGovern

(10,210 posts)
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 06:10 PM 12 hrs ago

I was looking for an Ozzie Smith photograph from 1983 with the St. Louis Cardinals, and --


this is the man who took that famous photograph. His name is Scott Rovak. Guess what he shoots with . . .
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I was looking for an Ozzie Smith photograph from 1983 with the St. Louis Cardinals, and -- (Original Post) George McGovern 12 hrs ago OP
Well, I was going to say "Olympus" until I saw the logo on his camera . . . CaliforniaPeggy 11 hrs ago #1
Isn't it so Peggy. The hit was a line drive. It's batter was out. Instantly. George McGovern 11 hrs ago #2
Probably an F3 at the time. usonian 11 hrs ago #3
Not like those near you! Your Coolpix takes some really Cool Pix! "Bang for the buck!" George McGovern 9 hrs ago #4
Show me a really long lens under $1000. usonian 8 hrs ago #5
Thanks usonian. George McGovern 5 hrs ago #6

CaliforniaPeggy

(155,779 posts)
1. Well, I was going to say "Olympus" until I saw the logo on his camera . . .
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 06:38 PM
11 hrs ago

It says "Nikon."

Obviously he knew just how to use it. It's a stunning photo!

usonian

(22,644 posts)
3. Probably an F3 at the time.
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 07:04 PM
11 hrs ago

I just sent the F2 out for its regular 50 year tune-up.

Turning from Cardinals to Hawks (smooth transition), these were taken this week, with a Nikon Coolpix, code name "Hubble" for the extreme zoom. 2000 and 750mm effective focal length. I kicked up the gain to 400 to get shutter speed, so they are a tad grainy with the small sensor and cropping. Can't argue because the entire camera costs less than a telephoto in that range (if they exist).

As I posted on your other thread, my daughter has a new Olympus underwater camera and I'm looking forward to her photos.






Got any hawks at the new place? If so, KC beware.

usonian

(22,644 posts)
5. Show me a really long lens under $1000.
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 09:47 PM
8 hrs ago

Downside on all the Coolpix cameras is the small sensor (6X crop factor) but that's necessary to get the outrageous zoom ratios. Nikon discontinued ALL pocket Coolpix cameras, leaving only the portable telescopes.

The old Coolpix P510, which I used for over 10 years, seems much smaller now! "Only" 24-1000mm effective focal length.

Telephoto lenses are really expensive.

Nice thing about the mirrorless is that it accommodates old lenses via adapter. This came in handy with star and comet photos, where new motor-driven lenses will focus past infinity, so focus in the dark is a fright. The old ones snapped on, and infinity is indeed, infinity.

I used the old 180mm/2.8 to get this. Color removed. "To infinity and not beyond"



Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»I was looking for an Ozzi...