Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lees1975

(6,611 posts)
Sat Jun 14, 2025, 12:49 PM Yesterday

Why the approval ratings for Democrats in Congress are so low

https://signalpress.blogspot.com/2025/06/why-approval-ratings-are-so-low-for.html

We lost a Presidential election, and in the aftermath of all of that, which included some very strong-armed attempts at pushing narratives to explain why which were not accurate and which missed a lot of what went wrong, no strong leadership has emerged. At a time when it is needed the most, the party appears fractured because a clear leader who has the ability to attract support from all constituencies has not yet emerged.

What appears to have happened, by my own observation, is that all but a few of the Democrats who survived the 2024 election went into turf protection mode. Not much criticism has been levelled at those who plunged the party into mass confusion right after Biden's first debate performance crashed and burned over the manner in which getting him to step away from the nomination was handled. There was absolutely no excuse for that, and regardless of what political analysts who have a vested interest in focusing attention elsewhere have to say, it was, in my opinion, those weeks of confusion and the headless manner in which Democrats handled it, that cost Kamala Harris by the tiny percentages of votes by which she lost the swing states.

That is, by the way, the point at which the approval ratings began to wane. In spite of the messaging that the party was attempting to use to contrast themselves with the GOP, it was the big money contributors who grabbed the limelight, and control of the narrative, and got their way. At least, they got their way for the moment, long enough to convince those who thought the party was different in this regard from the GOP, to stay at home on election day.


Sanders, meanwhile, is taking his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, which is getting bigger crowds than Presidential rallies did for either party in 2024, back on the road, to Oklahoma, Texas and Louisiana. One stop will occur in Shreveport, Louisiana, in Speaker Mike Johnson's home district. Any kind of showing there at all will be an embarassment to Johnson, and it's getting the point across to all those local news outlets who will be there to cover the event. It also helps support local candidates running for office.

I can't wait to watch coverage of his Shreveport rally.


When we have members of Congress who are committed to serving the interests of the people who elected them, then we have a functioning Republic, and we don't have that now. But I'm more than willing to bet that the members of Congress with the best shot at winning elections will be the ones who are interested in their constituents, and their perspectives, and how they need to be served by the government that belongs to them, find out what those interests are, and become their champion, rather than the ones who are just interested in how to raise enough money to get another term with paycheck and perks.

And when we start seeing Democrats getting out there among the people, listening, and then taking real action to demonstrate that they are sincere, not phonies and frauds, or shills for a more powerful politician, those approval ratings will soar, and they will set the conventional political wisdom of who votes red and who votes blue on its ear.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the approval ratings for Democrats in Congress are so low (Original Post) lees1975 Yesterday OP
Short version: nothing would be different if they stayed home. usonian Yesterday #1
We have chuck! Hornedfrog2000 23 hrs ago #2
FAFO Skittles 16 hrs ago #3
I don't understand sitting out elections. lees1975 3 hrs ago #4

usonian

(18,326 posts)
1. Short version: nothing would be different if they stayed home.
Sat Jun 14, 2025, 12:57 PM
Yesterday

A fighting force of maybe 10?

OK in basketball and baseball. Not in the war against democracy.

Step it up!

Hornedfrog2000

(259 posts)
2. We have chuck!
Sat Jun 14, 2025, 02:03 PM
23 hrs ago

Ive been saying for a long time we need more 80ish year olds in congress. A lot of our own leaders are fat, happy, and well paid... we need drastic changes.

lees1975

(6,611 posts)
4. I don't understand sitting out elections.
Sun Jun 15, 2025, 10:12 AM
3 hrs ago

When I realized that Schumer wasn't going to push to end the filibuster, supported by the Senate Democratic "club", I was extremely disappointed. Surely, I thought, Democrats in Congress could see that the Supreme Court was the blockade protecting Trump from prosecution, and so they would use the tools they had when they were the majority to break the filibuster in order to amend the judiciary act and pack the court with liberals who would make sure Trump's prosecution for insurrection was not delayed any more. I was disappointed when Biden didn't decide one term was enough and his age was going to be a factor, and he didn't open the door for primaries to choose the party's Presidential candidate. I was even more disapointed when the big donors made a stink after the debate and got their way after creating weeks of confusion, and disappointed that money in politics has corrupted some of the basic principles of the Democratic party. I know, fight fire with fire.

But I would NEVER stay home from an election and I wouldn't ever vote for a Republican in any contested seat.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why the approval ratings ...