Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.

https://www.lincolnsquare.media/p/can-we-trust-courts-to-stop-trumps

[Walleye]

1. I wish somebody would tally up the total cost of all these court cases. And is the DOJ doing nothing else?

It’s not like the civil courts where the loser pays the court costs.

[J_William_Ryan]

2. "Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?"

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.

[EarthAbides]

3. No

Once the fascist pig gets his robber baron budget passed, the courts will not be able to do anything. He is disguising his final control of our government in a tax cut for the rich. Once that bill passes the senate, which will be before his dictator parade, the coup will be done.

[lees1975]

4. No, the justice system is a monumental failure.

Too many delays, too much paper pushing, too little moments of real activity. Too many partisans who got into the legal field to turn the justice system to party politics.

It won't save us. It will promote the destruction of democracy.

They can't enforce the law. They issue rulings but he ignores them and no one does anything about it. He is not subject to the law and his approach is to do things first and ignore the questions about whether he can or not later. Until the FBI arrests him and jails him, like any other American would be for violating a court ruling, then nothing will change.

[Paladin]

5. No. (nt)