Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(174,242 posts)
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 08:48 AM 9 hrs ago

GOP Senator Says There's 'Zero Chance' Of Passing Key Piece Of Trump's Agenda

Source: Huff Post

Jul 10, 2026, 02:00 AM EDT


Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) gave President Donald Trump some tough love on Wednesday, saying there’s little to no chance of his “SAVE America Act” becoming law.

In an interview with Politico’s “On The Road,” Cramer was asked why more Republicans don’t tell the president he simply does not have the votes to get the legislation through Congress.

“I think he knows the votes aren’t there for it, unless we blow up the filibuster, that’s the bigger philosophical question,” Cramer said. “Is there any chance of that happening?” host Jonathan Martin asked. “There’s zero chance of that happening for very good reasons,” Cramer said.

The senator added he regrets that more of his colleagues who also oppose eliminating the filibuster refuse to say it publicly, giving the false impression that Trump is only a handful of votes away from getting the legislation passed.

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gop-senator-says-theres-zero-chance-of-passing-key-piece-of-trumps-agenda_n_6a504d8ee4b0aaa37424e8bf?origin=home-latest-news-unit

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Senator Says There's 'Zero Chance' Of Passing Key Piece Of Trump's Agenda (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago OP
For one thing, if the Senate nullified the filibuster, no_hypocrisy 9 hrs ago #1
If the fillibuster is so core to the Senate, then why did it not exist until 1806? Wiz Imp 6 hrs ago #6
The filibuster wasn't created by accident angrychair 6 hrs ago #7
The US Senate will NOT BE BULLIED! ProudMNDemocrat 9 hrs ago #2
Chump is losing friends over this, and a lot of Rs are getting disgusted FakeNoose 9 hrs ago #3
From North Dakota here. Hate this asshole, BUT bluestarone 8 hrs ago #4
I never thought I'd say it, but this time Trump has gone too far, even for Republicans. Fil1957 7 hrs ago #5

no_hypocrisy

(55,880 posts)
1. For one thing, if the Senate nullified the filibuster,
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 08:56 AM
9 hrs ago

in practical terms, there would be TWO Houses of Representatives, with legislation passing on the mere whims and passions of the members of both Houses.

The Senate was designed to be a deliberative body, wherein issues were slowly debated before votes. The filibuster slows down the process with objections by the minority to be considered. And as a consequence, the proposed legislation is either modified or shelved if a 60-vote majority can't pass it.

Wiz Imp

(11,040 posts)
6. If the fillibuster is so core to the Senate, then why did it not exist until 1806?
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 11:34 AM
6 hrs ago

Effectively having 2 Houses of Representatives is how Congress was set up by the Constitution.

In reality, the fillibuster was created by accident.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/impact-filibuster-federal-policymaking/

There is a stubborn myth that the filibuster is part of the Founders’ vision of government.1 However, not only does the U.S. Constitution make no mention of the filibuster, it also appears to assume that legislative decisions would be made by majority vote.2 The evidence suggests that the filibuster arose not out of any founding principles but instead out of “tenuous precedents and informal practices.”3

In fact, for much of early U.S. history, the Senate operated essentially by majority rule. Until 1806, a Senate rule allowed a simple majority to end debate on a bill and move to a vote.4 And when that rule was eliminated, in 1806, it appears that it was by mistake—senators were merely cleaning up their rulebook, on the advice of Vice President Aaron Burr, and did not realize that they had opened the door to unlimited obstruction.5 The first filibuster did not occur until more than 30 years later in 1837.6

The term filibuster entered use even later, in the 1850s, when it described the practice of senators giving lengthy speeches to delay a vote on a bill.7 Still, the filibuster was not commonly used—”in general, legislation passed by majority rule.”8 One reason may have been that, in order to sustain a filibuster, senators had to actually stand on the Senate floor and continue to speak—not an easy exercise to maintain indefinitely. When senators did so, it served more to delay legislation than to defeat it. In fact, “almost every filibustered measure before 1880 was eventually passed.”9

The modern-day filibuster is largely the product of two significant reforms: one in 1917 and another in 1974. During World War I, before the United States had entered the war, a group of 11 senators filibustered a bill that would have armed American merchant ships to protect them from attacks by German U-boats.10 Shortly thereafter, President Woodrow Wilson made a statement, published in The New York Times, stating that “[t]he Senate of the United States is the only legislative body in the world which cannot act when its majority is ready for action.”11 Referring to the 11 senators as “a little group of willful men,” Wilson stated, “The only remedy is that the rules of the Senate shall be so altered that it can act.”12


There had never been more than five filibusters in a single year prior to 1966, but there were 10 each year from 1971 to 1973 and 18 filibusters in 1974. There were 218(!) cloture votes in 2013-14. NOBODY ever envisioned that the Senate should work this way. Consider that the 21 states with the fewest residents, who collectively have enough Senators to filibuster legislation, make up only 11 percent of the total population. The 21 least-populous states currently represented by two Republican senators—enough to sustain a filibuster—represent less than 25 percent of the U.S. population.

angrychair

(12,640 posts)
7. The filibuster wasn't created by accident
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 11:55 AM
6 hrs ago

It was created because of racism.

The only reason the filibuster exists was as a tool to prevent the progressives from voting out Jim Crow laws.

That's it

It was racism.

Filibusters should not be automatic. They should require active defense and nonstop talking.

They should do an initial hard vote. If the difference is 2 votes or less the opposing side have the ability to go to an active filibuster
And if they cannot change the vote(s) within 48 hours then it automatically goes to a simple majority vote.
Also, once a bill goes to a active defense filibuster no more amendments of the bill are allowed (to prevent the "buying"/horse trading of votes)

ProudMNDemocrat

(21,041 posts)
2. The US Senate will NOT BE BULLIED!
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 09:04 AM
9 hrs ago

Unlike the House, the Senate has different rules. If something requires 60 votes, THAT is the rule!

Reconciliation only happens when a proposal before the Senate and then approved or not by the Senate Parliamentarian if connected to the Budget, gets a 50 plus 1 vote up or down. Trump has no idea as to how the Senate works.

FakeNoose

(43,332 posts)
3. Chump is losing friends over this, and a lot of Rs are getting disgusted
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 09:12 AM
9 hrs ago

It used to Mitch McConnell who told Chump to just back off on something that had no way of getting passed in Congress. Chump would listen, maybe not, but he would know it's a dead issue. But old Mitch isn't around and the rest of them are all afraid of Chump.

bluestarone

(22,648 posts)
4. From North Dakota here. Hate this asshole, BUT
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 09:45 AM
8 hrs ago

I'm glad he's saying this. Makes me feel better about this dumb bill passing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP Senator Says There's ...