Ex-CIA Director John Brennan seeks court order requiring records from investigations be preserved
Source: AP
Updated 1:47 PM EDT, July 1, 2026
WASHINGTON (AP) Former CIA Director John Brennan sued the Trump administration on Wednesday, demanding a court order that would require officials to preserve records from investigations that he says are targeting him for phantom criminal conduct.
Brennan said in the lawsuit that the records would be essential for him to mount a defense on vindictive prosecution grounds in the event of a future indictment brought by the administration. Such a defense, his lawyers said, would be supported by the more than 100 verbal or written statements that President Donald Trump has made since 2017 lambasting Brennan and by the Republican presidents directives to his Department of Justice to initiate cases without regard to factual or legal justification.
To fully consider those motions, the reviewing judge would need to scrutinize the motivations of the Justice Department officials who directed, oversaw, or undertook those actions to determine whether they violated Director Brennans rights, and specifically whether they were motivated by a desire to vindictively prosecute him as an act of retribution, Brennans lawyers wrote in the lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington.
The lawsuit names as defendants Trump and other top law enforcement officials from his administration, including acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel and the prosecutors in Florida who have been overseeing investigations related to Brennan and other former perceived Trump adversaries.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/brennan-cia-russia-justice-department-investigation-0953e358307a391d6f1c0da14b18bf4e
Link to SUIT (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.294102/gov.uscourts.dcd.294102.1.0.pdf
Dr. T
(836 posts)It might have occurred before her time.
But, she needs some justicing. Can't let her walk away like nothing happened. Same with Noem.
Bayard
(30,752 posts)Rhiannon12866
(261,593 posts)Former CIA Director John Brennan is going on offense by asking a judge to order Trumps Justice Department to preserve documents related to two investigation into him. Chief Washington Correspondent at MeidasTouch Scott MacFarlane joins the conversation. - Aired on 07/01/2026.
Danascot
(5,345 posts)baseless and vindictive lawsuits should do the same.
FakeNoose
(43,179 posts)I thought that was part of discovery - I show you mine and you show me yours.
Prairie Gates
(8,708 posts)This lawsuit is seeking communications between various parties of the state regardless of whether it could be used as evidence against the defendant.
LetMyPeopleVote
(184,345 posts)After a year of facing a Justice Department investigation, Brennan and his lawyers are now going on the offensive.
Former CIA Director John Brennan sues Trumpâs DOJ, pushing back against probe
— Donald Pedersen (@watchingevil.bsky.social) 2026-07-01T17:54:07.514Z
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-john-brennan-doj-lawsuit-records
This week, however, Brennan and his lawyers started pushing back in a new and important way, filing a new lawsuit related to the probe, which he sees as politically motivated. The suit specifically asked a federal judge to require the president and several prominent members of his team to preserve records related to the Brennan investigation, in the expectation that the former CIA director will respond to possible charges by accusing the administration of vindictive retribution.
Its not entirely clear why, exactly, the investigation into Brennan was launched in the first place it appears to have something to do with his congressional testimony related to Trumps Russia scandal though as The New York Times reported, the former CIA director has long been one of President Trumps most reviled political enemies.
The same Times report added, Almost everything about the inquiries into Mr. Brennan has been unorthodox, suggesting that prosecutors focused first on him as a target and only then set about looking for a crime with which he might be charged.
Its worth emphasizing for context that Brennan was also included on FBI Director Kash Patels so-called enemies list, filled with those he identified as government gangsters, and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt last year condemned the former CIA director as a disgraceful individual for reasons she did not explain.
I saw Brennan on Nicole yesterday. This lawsuit is a good move
LetMyPeopleVote
(184,345 posts)I watched Nicole's interview of Brennan yesterday. It was a great interview. The trump DOJ has forfeited the "presumption of regularity" which is going to help Brennan. I think that this lawsuit is a good idea
Scott MacFarlane, the chief Washington correspondent for MeidasTouch, was stunned on Wednesday after reading a "subtle" line tucked away in a new lawsuit against the Trump administration.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-07-02T06:00:12.822Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawsuit-2677144473
Former CIA Director John Brennan sued the Trump Department of Justice over its investigation into him for allegedly making false statements to Congress and for grand conspiracy. In the 46-page filing, the former intelligence professional used a phrase that piqued MacFarlane's interest, who described it as a "striking" thing for Brennan to include.
"In light of this Justice Department's highly irregular conduct, courts now recognize that it no longer deserves the presumption of regularity in certain categories of cases, and in particular in those against the president's perceived enemies," the lawsuit reads in part.
MacFarlane honed in on the phrase "presumption of regularity."
"That phrase ... sounds benign," MacFarlane said. "That is such a scathing thing to say. The courts function on the presumption of regularity ... What John Brennan is saying is that they can't be trusted."
In the lawsuit, Brennan asked the court to compel the Trump administration to preserve all investigatory materials, fearing they would be destroyed. Brennan also questioned whether the Trump DOJ was being animated by a conspiracy theory to pursue charges against him in the first place.
Link to tweet