Texas is pushing forward with plans to make parts of the Bible required reading in public classrooms
Source: The Independent
Thursday 25 June 2026 10:45 EDT
Texas is poised to mandate Bible stories as required reading for over 5 million public school students, a move that has reignited a fierce national debate over widening efforts across the U.S. to introduce more religion into classrooms.
The Republican-controlled Texas State Board of Education is scheduled to cast a final vote on the proposal this Friday. This follows Texas's 2023 decision to become the largest state to require the display of the Ten Commandments in every classroom, a measure that drew significant legal challenges.
The controversial plan faces strong opposition from critics who argue it violates the constitutional separation of church and state, unduly elevates Christianity's role in national history, and prioritizes it over other faiths. Conversely, supporters contend that Judeo-Christian traditions were fundamental to the nations founding and that this influence should be accurately reflected in public school curricula.
President Donald Trump has advocated for protecting and expanding religious expression in public schools nationwide. Texas, a deeply conservative state that educates approximately one in ten U.S. public school students, frequently sets precedents in such matters. In 2023, Texas became the first state to permit the hiring of chaplains for student counseling. Subsequently, the board narrowly approved an optional Bible-infused curriculum for elementary schools.
Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/texas-bible-stories-public-schools-donald-trump-mandate-b3002720.html
hookaleft
(1,450 posts)tishaLA
(14,850 posts)They'll savor the opportunity to overturn decades of precedent.
Initech
(109,729 posts)No, we should not give up our rights to these fuckheads.
TheRickles
(3,583 posts)ancianita
(43,451 posts)of establishing, funding, and regulating public schools to individual states.
All states' curricula are decided by the public through their state boards of education.
If this is a state board of ed decision, it can stand constitutional scrutiny. But parents have recourse. If parents don't want their children exposed to bible texts, they have the right to have their children read other texts, and principals are bound to honor parents' wishes, since Bible readings are not revealed here to be core graduation requirements. If they are, parents could get alternative readings, even though state boards of educations have approved Bible texts.
Overall, the separation of church and state is an idea derived from the First Amendment (The actual phrase originated from a private letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. In it, he described the First Amendment as building a "wall of separation between Church & State" ), but his phrasing is not literally a written part of US founding documents.
It's not a done deal if a plaintiff with standing (maybe a teachers' statewide organization, or a statewide parents organization) files against the decision in the courts.
Ilikepurple
(832 posts)Through the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. Im often surprised at the confidence people have in their understanding of Constitutional law and the moving target of Supreme Court precedent. Also, much Constitutional law isnt found in US founding documents, including the 1st Amendments application to states. Like much Constitutional Law, we can thank or condemn the Supreme Court for its current state. Absolutely not determinative but the following is a USSC endorsement of Jeffersons sentiment.
Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups, and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect "a wall of separation between church and State." Reynolds v. United States, supra, at 98 U. S. 164. Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)
Im not sure how this Court will ultimately decide this case if it ever has the case before it, but whether it can stand constitutional scrutiny is not settled law
ancianita
(43,451 posts)Agree about Supreme Court precedent being a moving target for this USSC.
jls4561
(3,340 posts)Holofernes is a local warlord who is about to pillage Judiths village. Judith, sure the pillaging will also include raping, enters Holofernes tent, gets him drunk and cuts off his head, thus saving her village and her people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_beheading_Holofernes
It seems to me to be a good story for these troubled times. Of course, the beheading should be metaphorical.
Ocelot II
(131,909 posts)Initech
(109,729 posts)dickthegrouch
(4,746 posts)There were three guys and one woman. Where did the incest occur?
Was Cain destined to become an incel if Abel had lived?
Enquiring minds want to know.
paleotn
(23,127 posts)God found a way or stop asking questions / just have faith were not valid answers. So if that can't be true, what else isn't true? Pull one loose thread and the whole thing unravels.
ColoringFool
(1,439 posts)ananda
(35,875 posts)...
Americanme
(604 posts)before they are tainted by rational thought.
paleotn
(23,127 posts)Take the deep south and corn country with them and they can all go off and be Jebusland. Forced religion. A tiny plutocracy that owns everything. And poverty kids on every corner. You know, a real shit hole country. Maybe then the rest of us can have nice things.
sakabatou
(46,573 posts)FullySupportDems
(525 posts)As all good Christians should, you wouldn't want to force your religion on others. You wouldn't think it's right. These people don't believe in anything, but money.
Like Ice Tea said in his remake of Comfortably Numb, "If there is a god, we probably make him sick"
travelingthrulife
(5,769 posts)Control freaks.
FullySupportDems
(525 posts)Even when they're insincere and don't believe a word of what they say, they will still use that religion to get what they want.
purr-rat beauty
(1,694 posts)So....OT? NT?
IF OT....assholes best not teach it in mixed fibers
BadgerMom
(3,471 posts)It would take me an afternoon to put together lesson plans that included readings from the Koran, the Torah and Talmud, the Vedas, the Book of Mormon You get the picture. I know it would cause a ruckus. Deal with it, you small-minded assholes.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(2,449 posts)J_William_Ryan
(3,679 posts)Correct.
This is a Court dominated by conservative ideologues long hostile to settled, accepted precedent Establishment Clause jurisprudence in particular.
Dr. T
(836 posts)What exactly are they trying to accomplish? Do they really think that religion will stop murder, rape, school shootings, and other crimes? How has that been working with the Ten Commandments in classrooms? My guess is that the crime rate needle hasn't budged at all.
LetMyPeopleVote
(184,345 posts)Trumps religious liberty commission made the case for theocratic objectives, which was every bit as unsettling as it seemed.
Thomas Jefferson said the First Amendment created a âwall of separation of church and state.â
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-06-29T12:01:06.202Z
More than two centuries later, an official White House commission wants to replace the âwallâ â with a theocracy-friendly âbridge.â
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/white-house-religious-liberty-commission-church-and-state
Four years later, these theocratic attitudes have found a home in the White House. The Associated Press reported:
A new report by a Trump administration commission suggests replacing the idea of separating church and state with the idea of building bridges between them.
The assertion challenging a longstanding concept in American law comes amid a raft of recommendations in a draft report of the Religious Liberty Commission, released Friday afternoon.
Shortly after Donald Trump returned to the Oval Office, he created this commission and filled it with conservative Christians aligned with the religious right movement. To the surprise of no one, it produced a 224-page draft report that endorsed a variety of goals, including more government promotion of religion, new laws to allow faith-based leaders to endorse politicians while maintaining their tax-exempt status, and allowing faith-based groups with government contracts to ignore civil rights laws while receiving taxpayer money.
In case this isnt obvious, the First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. According to Thomas Jefferson, those 16 words created a wall of separation between church and state.
Centuries later, Trumps commission wants to replace the metaphor with a new one.
The concept of a wall of separation between church and state can wrongly imply that church and state are opposed to one another and must remain completely separate, the panels members wrote in their report. In reality, however, church and state strengthen and support one another. Perhaps a better analogy is that religious liberty acts as a bridge between church and state.....
As a practical matter, its entirely possible that the commissions recommendations were an elaborate chest-thumping exercise, which will have little if any impact on policymaking. But the fact that an official White House panel endorsed creating a bridge between church and state is an unsettling development, whether anything meaningful comes of its efforts or not.
This is scary. trump wants to break down the wall between the church and state
travelingthrulife
(5,769 posts)Igel
(37,722 posts)Some of it's gonna hurt hard: Great Expectations?
Anthony Trollope is a strange choice, I'd think. Sort of nice to have the Mayflower Compact tossed in in 5th grade--I'm guessing some of the English readings align with the Social Studies curriculum. Even during my stint teaching, science was encouraged to provide readings for the corresponding ELA courses (tried it once, the teachers just stared--don't know what they wanted for juniors, physics was the junior grade science and it dealt with physics-relevant 'stuff'; then it turned out most never had physics and *they* couldn't understand it).
Anyway, the list:
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/projects/2026/texas-schools-required-reading-list/?noapp=true&sid=&ss=P&st_rid=null
cpamomfromtexas
(1,503 posts)wcmagumba
(7,070 posts)and many other faiths?..
karynnj
(61,262 posts)translation and which parts to teach.