Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,708 posts)
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 07:07 PM 16 hrs ago

Sugary drinks and candy now off-limits for millions using SNAP benefits

Source: Scripps News

Posted 7:09 AM, Mar 10, 2026


Millions of Americans who rely on federal food assistance are facing new restrictions on what they can purchase, as more states roll out bans on sugary drinks and snacks under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

So far, 22 states are implementing bans on items like soda, candy, and energy drinks through waivers submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The latest states approved to move forward are Kansas, Nevada, Ohio, and Wyoming.

The changes have caught some recipients off guard. Kassy Donat, a SNAP recipient in Idaho, forgot about the rule change until she tried to buy a drink during a routine shopping trip. "I scanned the EBT card, and it declined," Donat said. Donat ended up paying with her debit card, but said the restrictions stretched her already tight budget.

Bans on using SNAP benefits for junk food

While SNAP is a federal program, states are given flexibility on whether to restrict certain items, meaning there is no one-size-fits-all approach to how the changes are being rolled out.

Read more: https://www.scrippsnews.com/us-news/sugary-drinks-and-candy-now-off-limits-for-millions-using-snap-benefits

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sugary drinks and candy now off-limits for millions using SNAP benefits (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago OP
restrictions just encourage shitty behavior Kali 16 hrs ago #1
The 'nanny' state? mzmolly 16 hrs ago #2
So have Coca-Cola and M&M/Mars sued yet? DJ Synikus Makisimus 15 hrs ago #3
This will probably force more stealing i'm afraid. bluestarone 15 hrs ago #4
Show me affordable healthy food... purr-rat beauty 15 hrs ago #5
Let's pass a bill that takes away lobster, crab legs, and ribeyes from the DOD budget. sinkingfeeling 15 hrs ago #6
Throw them a sammich, with musterd. twodogsbarking 15 hrs ago #7
If they want to encourage healthy eating, they should make healthy food cheaper DBoon 15 hrs ago #8
buy a box of sugar, a bottle of seltzer water, some flavoring and voila soda for less nt msongs 15 hrs ago #9
I have no problem with this. NH Ethylene 15 hrs ago #10
DOD - $93 BILLION in one month KT2000 15 hrs ago #11
If that stuff is really bad for us... Escape 14 hrs ago #12
Are these people opposed to Halloween candy, too? lostnfound 11 hrs ago #13
When healthy food becomes more affordable than junk food Torchlight 3 hrs ago #14
Perhaps, I would have a certain percentage of junk food..(Chips..Ice cream) chouchou 2 hrs ago #15

Kali

(56,805 posts)
1. restrictions just encourage shitty behavior
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 07:22 PM
16 hrs ago

trade you some "healthy" food for whatever I am not allowed to buy

people are fucking stupid...and clever

mzmolly

(52,773 posts)
2. The 'nanny' state?
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 07:43 PM
16 hrs ago

I'm all for healthier eating but it saddens me to think a child in poverty can't have a snack. This feels like a way to shame the poor.

DJ Synikus Makisimus

(1,404 posts)
3. So have Coca-Cola and M&M/Mars sued yet?
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 07:52 PM
15 hrs ago

Beating up those on Public Assistance is a hobby horse of the right, and among certain "liberals," in America; so this is hardly a surprise. Since the legislators aren't likely to do anything about much of anything that sucks, it's fallen to the courts to decide such things. Big corporate interests COULD lead to an overturn in this case, unless it's filed in the 5th Circuit.

DBoon

(24,913 posts)
8. If they want to encourage healthy eating, they should make healthy food cheaper
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 08:22 PM
15 hrs ago

Use SNAP to subsidize fresh fruit, vegetables, etc.

NH Ethylene

(31,325 posts)
10. I have no problem with this.
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 08:26 PM
15 hrs ago

People are free to spend their money on garbage food whenever they want, but there is no reason the taxpayers should have to fund it. Now if they start dictating which foods they can buy (like no steak, for example), I will be opposed.

KT2000

(22,107 posts)
11. DOD - $93 BILLION in one month
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 08:29 PM
15 hrs ago

on frivolous spending to get rid of the excess in their budget.

Escape

(443 posts)
12. If that stuff is really bad for us...
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 09:06 PM
14 hrs ago

maybe the 79 year old obese president should be forced to drop the diet cokes and hamberders.

lostnfound

(17,481 posts)
13. Are these people opposed to Halloween candy, too?
Wed Mar 11, 2026, 12:18 AM
11 hrs ago

Not a fan of junk food but also not a fan of a nanny state micromanaging people’s parenting decisions and food choices.

Torchlight

(6,716 posts)
14. When healthy food becomes more affordable than junk food
Wed Mar 11, 2026, 08:23 AM
3 hrs ago

someone, somewhere may have a point. Until then, it's just noise to sanctimoniously legislate the trivialization of a demographic.

chouchou

(3,090 posts)
15. Perhaps, I would have a certain percentage of junk food..(Chips..Ice cream)
Wed Mar 11, 2026, 09:09 AM
2 hrs ago

10 percent? 15 percent?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sugary drinks and candy n...