Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,677 posts)
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 07:44 AM 7 hrs ago

Supreme Court Justices Jackson and Kavanaugh clash over handling of Trump cases

Source: NBC News

March 9, 2026, 7:46 PM EDT


WASHINGTON — Internal Supreme Court divisions over how the high court has frequently ruled in favor of the Trump administration in emergency situations spilled out into public Monday with liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh locking horns.

The court's conservative majority has on a regular basis blocked lower court rulings that have stymied President Donald Trump's agenda, sparking criticism from within and outside the judiciary.

Jackson, often a vocal dissenter in those cases, forcefully aired her critique of the court's actions in a rare public appearance with Kavanaugh at an event for lawyers and judges held at the federal courthouse in Washington. Bemoaning the recent increase in such emergency filings — requested to challenge lower court rulings — she suggested that the number of filings would drop if the court were stingier about granting them.

The procedure has become known as the “shadow docket” because the court rarely hears arguments and often issues terse decisions with little explanation. The Supreme Court decisions can allow policies to go into effect at early stages in legal challenges, long before lower courts have reached any definitive conclusions. The cases might then return to the Supreme Court later in the process, leading to final decisions on the merits.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-justices-jackson-kavanaugh-clash-handling-trump-cases-rcna262622

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Justices Jackson and Kavanaugh clash over handling of Trump cases (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
I am so glad we have Justice Jackson on the SC!! riversedge 7 hrs ago #1
Yes, so true..she is brilliant mountain grammy 5 hrs ago #4
The shadow docket needs to be eliminated. MLWR 6 hrs ago #2
The Shadow Docket could be rebranded C_U_L8R 5 hrs ago #3
We need to impeach the members of the court who lied in their confirmation hearings, BComplex 5 hrs ago #5
A prediction: cab67 4 hrs ago #6
The prediction was that Alito would do so first BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago #7
I would have thought Thomas because of his age. cab67 2 hrs ago #10
Good BaronChocula 1 hr ago #11
Unfortunately - cab67 6 min ago #12
Expand the court by multiples of 9, say 27 or more. Make them rotate randomly into travelingthrulife 4 hrs ago #8
A short description... littlemissmartypants 2 hrs ago #9

MLWR

(976 posts)
2. The shadow docket needs to be eliminated.
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 08:53 AM
6 hrs ago

It serves only as a lazy-@$$ means for the justices not to do their jobs of justifying with rational argument their giving trump whatever he wants, and even violating the words and/or principles laid out in the Constitution.

C_U_L8R

(49,294 posts)
3. The Shadow Docket could be rebranded
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 09:26 AM
5 hrs ago

Maybe The Authoritarian Shortcut or The Supreme Favor Dispenser.
Though Shadow Docket sounds appropriately corrupt.

BComplex

(9,863 posts)
5. We need to impeach the members of the court who lied in their confirmation hearings,
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 10:14 AM
5 hrs ago

or who have been hob-nobbing with political hacks who are offering them the big nazi (Heritage foundation, Federalist society) bucks to rule in their favor.

cab67

(3,694 posts)
6. A prediction:
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 10:17 AM
4 hrs ago

- if Democrats win control of the Senate this November, Clarence Thomas will immediately announce his retirement. Alito might also do so.

The Rs know Democrats won't let Trump appoint another hard-right ideologue to the Supreme Court. They'll follow the McConnell Rule and ram the nominations through before the new Congress is sworn in in January 2027.

BumRushDaShow

(168,677 posts)
7. The prediction was that Alito would do so first
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 10:46 AM
4 hrs ago

as he apparently hinted at it with hit latest book.

BaronChocula

(4,437 posts)
11. Good
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 02:03 PM
1 hr ago

And Democrats should refuse nomination hearings based on the McConnell rule - that the voters should decide SCOTUS nominations via the next presidential election.

cab67

(3,694 posts)
12. Unfortunately -
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 03:10 PM
6 min ago

as long as Republicans control the Senate, they can call hearings and approve the nominations. There won't be much Democrats can do about it. They can't filibuster these things anymore.

travelingthrulife

(5,054 posts)
8. Expand the court by multiples of 9, say 27 or more. Make them rotate randomly into
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 10:58 AM
4 hrs ago

9 judge panels. They will have more difficulty making these political alliances. Plus, we need more justices, we have lots more people and legal business.

Make them less special. They are public servants.

Term limits and actual, real punishments for crimes or unethical behavior.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Justices Ja...