Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,859 posts)
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 04:05 AM 21 hrs ago

House Democrats launch probe into Trump officials and oil companies

Source: MS NOW

Jan. 9, 2026, 4:45 PM EST


House Democrats on Friday launched a probe into possible conflicts of interest following the U.S. military incursion into Venezuela last weekend, seeking to learn whether Trump administration officials or oil companies have or will benefit from the situation.

Democratic members of the House Oversight Committee, led by ranking member Robert Garcia, D-Calif., on Friday sent letters to the chief executives of four major oil companies — Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Continental Resources — ahead of a meeting with oil executives at the White House that afternoon.

Democrats requested the businesspeople provide information to help lawmakers determine “who stands to privately or personally benefit from President Trump’s actions and whether corrupt motives were a driving force in U.S. foreign policy decision.”

The letter comes amid mounting criticism and confusion on Capitol Hill — including from some Republicans — about how exactly Trump plans to rebuild Venezuela’s oil infrastructure and what companies will be investing in the effort. Trump has said the U.S. likely would be running Venezuela and extracting its oil for years, despite doubts from some executives about the feasibility of such a plan.

Read more: https://www.ms.now/news/democrats-oil-companies-trump-investigation-venezuela



Link to House Oversight Democrats PRESS RELEASE - Ranking Member Robert Garcia, All Oversight Democrats, Launch Investigation Into Trump Administration’s Communications with Oil Companies in Takeover of Venezuela

Link to LETTER (inquiry) (PDF) - https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/imo/media/doc/20260109letter_to_usoilandgasexecutivesrevenezuela.pdf
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Democrats launch probe into Trump officials and oil companies (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago OP
Venezuela's crude oil............... Lovie777 21 hrs ago #1
Iraq 2.0: The 'WMD' Charade Is Gone, Now It's Just a Blatant Oil Grab AcanthaV 21 hrs ago #2
hey wait a minute Skittles 20 hrs ago #3
Problem is BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #4
So I think ultimately the minerals in Venezuela may be more interesting - TBF 12 hrs ago #6
Aren't most wars ultimately started for corporations and politicians benefit? Bayard 13 hrs ago #5
Look into the mineral wealth. Who wants the rare earths? truthisfreedom 12 hrs ago #7

Lovie777

(21,783 posts)
1. Venezuela's crude oil...............
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 04:35 AM
21 hrs ago

American oil companies cost for refining it?

Will that cost trickle down on to us?

AcanthaV

(8 posts)
2. Iraq 2.0: The 'WMD' Charade Is Gone, Now It's Just a Blatant Oil Grab
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 04:44 AM
21 hrs ago

Here we go again. It’s a page straight out of the 2003 playbook, but this time they aren’t even bothering with the 'WMD' charade. Sending letters to Exxon and Chevron is a critical first step by the Oversight Committee. We need to expose the backroom deals made before the first boots hit Venezuelan soil. The hypocrisy of the 'America First' crowd supporting a blatant neocolonial oil grab is staggering. It was never about democracy; it was always about the resources.

Skittles

(169,635 posts)
3. hey wait a minute
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 05:20 AM
20 hrs ago

"DRUGS" replaced the "WMD charade" - that's the "reason" they gave for blowing up the fishermen before the oil grab

BumRushDaShow

(165,859 posts)
4. Problem is
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 08:57 AM
17 hrs ago

the whole "oil situation" is so different from the Poppy & Shrub era. Why? Fracking!



Even if Saudi went full bore (which they aren't currently but had threatened to do when they were doing their "price war" against Russia back in March/April 2020), we could still outproduce due to the fracking (with the infrastructure currently in place).

I found this interesting video graphic a few years ago that tracked the changes of the global oil production over the decades since 1970 -



(am guessing this represents ALL products from the extractions of crude including LNG, etc)

TBF

(35,674 posts)
6. So I think ultimately the minerals in Venezuela may be more interesting -
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 01:44 PM
12 hrs ago

I know from living in Houston that the oil companies here have been burned by Venezuela in the past (their view), I think it's going to take a lot to get them involved again. And, yes, I think Trump will lean on them.

I also think it's a handy diversion - no one is talking about Epstein anymore & that is clearly his kryptonite.

Bayard

(28,626 posts)
5. Aren't most wars ultimately started for corporations and politicians benefit?
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 12:57 PM
13 hrs ago

One hand greases the other.

truthisfreedom

(23,518 posts)
7. Look into the mineral wealth. Who wants the rare earths?
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 01:54 PM
12 hrs ago

The oil is nasty. The oil companies are not offering to invest. What is really at play? What drugs was he interrupting and why? Who wanted to sell more drugs in Europe and western Africa? Who benefited from all of these actions? If Trump is focused on talking about the oil, the real reason for the invasion is hidden in the smoke screen.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrats launch pr...