Stefanik urges Treasury to probe CAIR's alleged Hamas links
Source: The Hill
10/16/25 7:47 AM ET
ALBANY, N.Y. (NEXSTAR) U.S. Congressmember Elise Stefanik of New York wants the U.S. Department of the Treasury to investigate the Council on American-Islamic Relations for possible sanctions violations or financial links to Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. CAIR, the nations largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, called a letter that Stefanik wrote to the Treasury an attempt to trigger a McCarthy-era witch hunt.
U.S. House Republican Leadership Chair Stefanik and Senate Republican Conference Chair Tom Cotton wrote to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday. They asked him to immediately investigate whether CAIR maintains financial links to Hamas that constitute violation of U.S. sanctions on Hamas.
The congressional leaders argued that federal authorities identified the Islamic Association for Palestinewhich CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad and co-founder Omar Ahmad previously ledas a propaganda arm for Hamas. Awad and Ahmad attended a 1993 meeting of the Muslim Brotherhoods Palestine Committee in Philadelphia, they wrote, where participants discussed creating a new group to support Hamas while concealing its ties. CAIR formed in 1994.
Report: New Yorks power grid strained by old infrastructure, demand
The letter also said that in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator. It said that evidence in that case showed direct financial interactions between CAIR and the defunct charity, which was linked to Hamas.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/5557166-stefanik-urges-treasury-to-probe-cairs-alleged-hamas-links/
CAIR supported the "Uncommitted" movement.
angrychair
(11,322 posts)Well I guess they got what they wanted.
nycbos
(6,608 posts)so I have no problem with this if my understanding is correct. Feel free to fact check me.
maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)nycbos
(6,608 posts)doesnt mention Tianamen
maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)Response to maxsolomon (Reply #9)
Name removed Message auto-removed
maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)I'm in complete agreement with you. They don't even have to condemn 10/7. They have freedom of speech.
AloeVera
(3,889 posts)Sad.
maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)Whether or not the Trumpists pursue them for their speech is a separate matter.
They're not being prevented from speaking to this point.
AloeVera
(3,889 posts)You might have missed the developments in this very thread
Jose Garcia
(3,341 posts)AloeVera
(3,889 posts)Jose Garcia
(3,341 posts)maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)I'm not the planet's biggest CAIR defender, but if the Trump Admin is going after them, I become skeptical.
I'd like to see the full transcript of the problematic speech.
Here's his statement:
In a statement, CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said:
As I said, The hatred, the prejudice, the violence, the discrimination against Jews because of their faith or their life or their religious practices is a hateful mindset, behavior and action. We as human beings, as Muslims, as Palestinians, see it as evil the way it is, and [it] should be condemned because antisemitism is a real phenomenon, a real evil, and it has to be rejected and combated by all people regardless of their faith tradition, ideology, or those people who have no ideology. It is an attack on humanity and should be clearly condemned by all people.
Despite my clear remarks, an anti-Muslim, anti-Palestinian hate website selected remarks from my speech out of context and spliced them together to create a completely false meaning.
What I actually said while discussing international law: Ukrainians, Palestinians and other occupied people have the right to defend themselves and escape occupation by just and legal means, but targeting civilians is never an acceptable means of doing so, which is why I have again and again condemned the violence against Israeli civilians on Oct. 7th and past Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians, including suicide bombings, all the way back to the 1990sjust as I have condemned the decades of violence against Palestinian civilians.
The average Palestinians who briefly walked out of Gaza and set foot on their ethnically cleansed land in a symbolic act of defiance against the blockade and stopped there without engaging in violence were within their rights under international law; the extremists who went on to attack civilians in southern Israel were not. Targeting civilians is unacceptable, no matter whether they are Israeli or Palestinian or any other nationality.
Jose Garcia
(3,341 posts)maxsolomon
(37,669 posts)The title of the OP is "Stefanik urges Treasury to probe CAIR's alleged Hamas links".
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
fujiyamasan
(796 posts)They made their bed. Let their fellow uncommitted members fund their legal fees.
Not my fucking problem at this point.
Response to fujiyamasan (Reply #6)
Post removed