Judge dismisses suit by young climate activists against Trump's pro-fossil fuel policies

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: The Guardian

Wed 15 Oct 2025 17.22 EDT
Last modified on Wed 15 Oct 2025 20.40 EDT


A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by young climate activists that aimed to halt Donald Trump’s pro-fossil fuel executive orders. The dismissal by US district judge Dana Christensen on Wednesday came after 22 plaintiffs, ages seven to 25 and from five states, sought to block three of the president’s executive orders, including those declaring a “national energy emergency” and seeking to “unleash American energy” – as well as one aimed at “reinvigorating” the US’s production of coal.

According to the plaintiffs, the executive orders amount to unlawful executive overreach and breach the state-created danger doctrine – a legal principle designed to prevent government officials from causing harm to their citizens. Among the plaintiffs were also several young individuals who had previously been part of the landmark 2023 Held v Montana case – the first constitutional climate trial in the United States.

In that case, a judge ruled in favor of the youth plaintiffs who argued that the Montana state government had violated their constitutional right to a healthy environment. In Wednesday’s ruling, Christensen said that the plaintiffs presented “overwhelming evidence that the climate is changing at a staggering pace, and that this change stems from the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide, caused by the production and burning of fossil fuels”.

However, Christensen said: “Yet while this court is certainly troubled by the very real harms presented by climate change and the challenged [executive orders’] effect on carbon dioxide emissions, this concern does not automatically confer upon it the power to act.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/oct/15/youth-climate-activist-lawsuit-dismissed-trump-executive-orders

---

Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.publicjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Doc-111-Order-2025.10.15.pdf

Link to PRESS RELEASE - Youth Plaintiffs Announce Appeal in Lighthiser v. Trump, Federal Right to Life Case

[Irish_Dem]

1. The is troubled by the harms to humans with climate change.

But won't do jack shit about it.

Sounds like the American court system today.

They acknowledge the many wrongs, but just wring their helpless damn hands.

[angrychair]

2. Always

Always a loophole.

However, Christensen said: “Yet while this court is certainly troubled by the very real harms presented by climate change and the challenged [executive orders’] effect on carbon dioxide emissions, this concern does not automatically confer upon it the power to act.”

"Yes, I see that the person, named in the complaint as Mother Nature, is being brutally beaten to death and while yes, I realize that once she dies the attacker will move on to kill everyone on Earth, I will do nothing about it because I am a spinless coward."