Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(162,468 posts)
Sun Oct 5, 2025, 03:36 PM Oct 5

Push for Military Coverage of I.V.F. Faces Challenge in Congress

Source: New York Times

Oct. 5, 2025, 5:00 a.m. ET


Kathleen Whipple and her husband had dreamed of a big family, but struggled to conceive. Upon his return from an overseas deployment with the Navy, the couple learned from a fertility doctor that her husband’s sperm count was half of what it had been before his most recent tour of duty, which had involved diving daily into water contaminated with heavy metals.

To get pregnant, the couple was told, they would need to undergo in vitro fertilization, a procedure that would cost over $25,000. And because they couldn’t prove that their infertility resulted from the circumstances of her husband’s deployment, they would have to shoulder the entire cost themselves.

“We would like to be able to purchase land and start building a home,” said Ms. Whipple, who is based in San Diego and asked to be referred to by her maiden name out of fear of retribution by the military against her husband. “We don’t have any savings anymore to do that.”

Such cases are the driving force behind an effort in Congress to expand military health coverage to cover I.V.F. for service members and their families, a push that has generated some degree of bipartisan support but has so far been thwarted by Republicans.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/05/us/politics/military-ivf-congress.html



No paywall (gift)
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Push for Military Coverag...