Police shoot suspect as at least two people killed in car and knife attack at Manchester synagogue
Source: The Guardian
Two people have died and three remain in a serious condition after a suspected terror attack outside a synagogue in Crumpsall by a man believed to have been shot dead by police, Greater Manchester police said.
Police shot the suspect after one person was stabbed and a car was driven at members of the public at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue.
The force said it had declared Plato  the national codeword used by police and emergency services when responding to a marauding terror attack  at 9.37am.
...
A third person, a man believed to be the offender, was shot by GMP firearms officers and is also believed to be deceased. It cannot currently be confirmed due to safety issues surround suspicious items on his person. The bomb disposal unit has been called and is now at the scene.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/02/police-at-scene-of-reported-stabbing-at-synagogue-in-manchester     
This is Manchester, England, to be clear.
Live BBC coverage: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx2703lnww4t
and The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2025/oct/02/police-reports-stabbing-synagogue-greater-manchester-live
 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				Solly Mack
(95,941 posts)EX500rider
(12,077 posts)
question everything
(51,269 posts)maxsolomon
(37,722 posts)It sounds as if they responded immediately. They just couldn't prevent it from starting.
EX500rider
(12,077 posts)https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpd93x0ql0do
Polybius
(21,058 posts)Unreal that it was overlooked.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)ITV News understands he was a father and his family had lived in Greater Manchester for at least 30 years.
Al-Shamie was understood to have entered the UK as a young child and been granted British citizenship in 2006 when he was around the age of 16. His father appears to have worked as a trauma surgeon for several NGOs in warzones across the world.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/major-incident-stabbing-synagogue-102938998.html
You'd really ban a family coming into a country in the 90s, because their son was called "Jihad"?
Polybius
(21,058 posts)It would turn out that it would have been the right thing to do, as lives were lost. I'd certainly ban his parents from entering the UK, after naming their kid Jihad.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)Polybius
(21,058 posts)It's not fascist to understand that the UK has a serious refuge problem, with a huge amount refusing to assimilate.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)I mean, yes, the father is a trauma surgeon who has worked with the ICRC in war zones around the world like South Sudan. So he's done a lot of good. And given the timeline, he was probably already a surgeon, or a surgeon in training, when they came in. It was not a "refugee" situation. 
The killer was an awful person at the end; but he hadn't been associated with extremism. Most of his life does not seem to have been a problem. So your idea that his first name indicated he was destined to be evil is just - bonkers.
Polybius
(21,058 posts)But it goes beyond that for me. I wouldn't have granted them asylum regardless of their names. UK has a refugee problem.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)But there's no indication the father came to the UK for asylum. He's a surgeon, and came with a young child (so had probably already started either training or practising), and Syria and the UK had normal relations in the 90s.
Not granting asylum to actual refugees is, of course, against international law. It is the kind of thing that Trump likes. I see you are saying countries should have been that cruel for 30 years.
Polybius
(21,058 posts)It's not against international law, btw. Countries make their own laws, or abide by EU laws. Yes, I am against asylum from certain countries with high amounts of violent religious extremists. Obvious exceptions would be if they are a persecuted religion that is fleeing from Al-Qaeda types.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)would be institutional power used against a foreigner because they're a foreigner. It would be fascist.
Remembering that this family were not refugees, yes, it's international law:
https://www.unhcr.org/uk/about-unhcr/who-we-protect/asylum-seekers
Saying "there are a lot of violent religious extremists in your country - screw the fact that you're persecuted yourself" would be highly right-wing - more so than the Conservatives have ever been. in the UK. It would fit in with the Tommy Robinson rally a few weeks ago - he's right-wing scum, a criminal, and a favourite of Elon Musk.
Polybius
(21,058 posts)I would not grant asylum to those from countries with a heavy presence of religious extremists, unless they (for example) were Christians escaping persecution in Sudan, or Jews from wherever. UK turned to the right because of this.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,091 posts)Jihad al-Shamie, 35, was being investigated over an alleged sexual attack, which it is understood was said to have taken place earlier this year.
The Syrian-born attacker is also believed to have criminal convictions, although he was not on the radar of counter-terrorism officers or of MI5.
Police said on Friday night that they believed Shamie may have been influenced by extreme Islamist ideology, but added: Establishing the full circumstances of the attack is likely to take some time.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/03/manchester-synagogue-terrorist-was-on-bail-for-alleged




