Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,994 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 03:20 PM Jul 1

HHS layoffs were likely unlawful and must be halted, US judge says

Last edited Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:27 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: ABC News/AP

July 1, 2025, 1:22 PM


PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- A federal judge has ruled that recent mass layoffs at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services were likely unlawful and ordered the Trump administration to halt plans to downsize and reorganize the nation's health workforce. U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose granted the preliminary injunction sought by a coalition of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia in a lawsuit filed in early May.

DuBose said the states had shown “irreparable harm,” from the cuts and were likely to prevail in their claims that “HHS’s action was both arbitrary and capricious as well as contrary to law.” “The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress,” DuBose wrote in a 58-page order handed down in U.S. district court in Providence.

Her order blocks the Trump administration from finalizing layoffs announced in March or issuing any further firings. HHS is directed to file a status report by July 11.

The ruling applies to terminated employees in four different divisions of HHS: the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Center for Tobacco Products within the Food and Drug Administration; the Office of Head Start within the Administration for Children and Families and employees of regional offices who work on Head Start matters; and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/hhs-layoffs-unlawful-halted-us-judge-123383428



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70134295/73/state-of-new-york-v-kennedy/

REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143453669
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HHS layoffs were likely unlawful and must be halted, US judge says (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jul 1 OP
Other agencies that have been decimated then can use this ruling, right? Bayard Jul 1 #1
I think there were other suits filed that applied to "all" BumRushDaShow Jul 1 #3
Is this a universal injunction? angrychair Jul 1 #2
I added the reference article about the original suit to the OP BumRushDaShow Jul 1 #4
You are a saint Bum angrychair Jul 1 #5
LOL! No problem BumRushDaShow Jul 1 #6
That's my secret Bum angrychair Jul 1 #7

Bayard

(26,059 posts)
1. Other agencies that have been decimated then can use this ruling, right?
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 03:58 PM
Jul 1

At least till it gets to the Supremes.

BumRushDaShow

(156,994 posts)
3. I think there were other suits filed that applied to "all"
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:35 PM
Jul 1

Am thinking that "all" one may have been filed in a 9th Circuit District (west coast).

I just added the reference article for this suit to the OP which is this one - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143453669

The suit by the AGs was filed in Rhode Island and is here - https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/state-of-new-york-et-al-v-robert-f-kennedy-united-states-department-of-health-and-human-servicses-et-al-complaint-2025.pdf

And per the last paragraph in the OP excerpts, applies to certain HHS agencies or offices within an agency including CDC, one of the offices within FDA (CTP that handles tobacco products), one of the offices in ACF that handles Head Start, and OPE, that falls directly under HHS as one of its main offices.

angrychair

(10,904 posts)
2. Is this a universal injunction?
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:15 PM
Jul 1

Is it valid since the latest SCOTUS ruling that courts cannot issue universal injunctions?

BumRushDaShow

(156,994 posts)
4. I added the reference article about the original suit to the OP
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 04:44 PM
Jul 1

I think this would just apply to those who filed although since it was filed in a 1st Circuit District (Rhode Island) it might apply to everyone under that Circuit too (from the original suit that was filed) - https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/state-of-new-york-et-al-v-robert-f-kennedy-united-states-department-of-health-and-human-servicses-et-al-complaint-2025.pdf

STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF
WASHINGTON; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND;
STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF
CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF
HAWAI‘I; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF
MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; THE PEOPLE
OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF
MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE
OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF OREGON; STATE
OF VERMONT; STATE OF WISCONSIN,


Since it w

BumRushDaShow

(156,994 posts)
6. LOL! No problem
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 05:28 PM
Jul 1

I am trying to keep track since there were over 250 lawsuits filed against 45.

And at least at the moment, you ain't "angry"!

angrychair

(10,904 posts)
7. That's my secret Bum
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 05:36 PM
Jul 1

I'm always angry.

(Reference the beginning of NYC fight scene in the original Avengers right after Bruce Banner rides up on a moped)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»HHS layoffs were likely u...