TR*mp says he plans to phase out FEMA after 2025 hurricane season
Source: CNN
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he plans to phase out the Federal Emergency Management Agency after this years hurricane season, offering the clearest timeline yet for his administrations long-term plans to dismantle the disaster relief agency and shift responsibility for response and recovery onto states.
We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level, Trump told reporters during a briefing in the Oval Office, later saying, A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they cant handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldnt be governor.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-plans-phase-fema-040445785.html
Sure, who needs government help after a disaster?

Ocelot II
(125,172 posts)QED
(3,151 posts)After all, he knows more about weather than God.
Irish_Dem
(70,708 posts)Health, science, medicine, education, vaccines, emergency assistance.
Ocelot II
(125,172 posts)It's not unhealthy to depend on your government for basic services. The Constitution says one of the government's primary purposes is "to promote the general welfare," which Trump and the GOP apparently think is communism.
Irish_Dem
(70,708 posts)Bluetus
(1,136 posts)Only Congress can change this.
Why is this basic fact never mentioned in any of these reports?
FredGarvin
(645 posts)He always does.
Congress has no say.
Bluetus
(1,136 posts)Where are the lawsuits on all of these things? There have been some lawsuits contesting firings, but where are the lawsuits contesting the unilateral decisions to close agencies altogether?
And why is the media not reporting on this illegal activity?
FredGarvin
(645 posts)Gotta admit it, Trump and the GOP are FULLY in control of America.
Really sad
Skittles
(164,850 posts)
republianmushroom
(20,192 posts)FredGarvin
(645 posts)Trump is going to disperse billions depending on voting.
Florida is going to get a lions share of the funds
Skittles
(164,850 posts)Trump doesn't care about them any more than he cares about blue states
the question he will ask will be WHAT CAN YOU DO FOR ME?
Johonny
(23,842 posts)Or are we accepting home insurance is just not going to be a thing in large areas of the US?
hay rick
(8,770 posts)Next year's failures won't matter because no criticism will be allowed.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(124,351 posts)Fucking idiot.
kimbutgar
(25,302 posts)I can dream and fantasize cant I ?
IronLionZion
(49,124 posts)Cheezoholic
(3,004 posts)the real estate developers move in and build multi million dollar resorts and mansions in new elite communities all along the sea from Brownsville to Cape Cod for pennies on the dollar. This is how they will finally remove the blight of commoners from beauty perceived as deserved by the few. There's a sinister plan at work here.
maxsolomon
(36,651 posts)TACO.
BigmanPigman
(53,155 posts)when they are not getting help from their States. I hope everyone who hears a constituent whine ask them who they voted for and sarcastically say, "My, my, what a shame". Followed by, "Tough shit, you get what you vote for idiot. You deserve this, I do NOT!
Mysterian
(5,682 posts)along with the graves of thousands of Americans.
Ol Janx Spirit
(277 posts)That makes it easy for them to believe that something like FEMA was just cooked up by some bureaucrat for the sole purpose of expanding the bureaucracy--therefore it can be eliminated with no repercussions.
But the history of the US government needing to be involved in emergency management goes back to at least 1803 during the 7th US Congress. It is actually an interesting history, and it is one that culminates with the creation of FEMA to better coordinate all of the different agencies that were required to effectively respond to the various emergencies experienced by the American people.
Asking the simple question of why the federal government has had to be involved in emergency management in some capacity for the last 220 years would--or should--lead one quickly to the conclusion that it must be more complicated than just something the states can take care of on their own.
Sure, states can--and do--perform a lot of their own emergency management. There are many things they do very well. But there are many things the federal government is uniquely positioned to do--especially in the area of prevention. Consider flooding alone: The Mississippi River touches 10 states. The Ohio River river flows through or along the border of six states, and its drainage basin includes parts of 14 states. A lack of federal coordination leaves these states to figure out the issues surrounding mitigation and other responsibilities themselves.
Imagine also a nuclear powerplant disaster. Radiation--like so many other things--does not stop at the border of a state; and how many states have the capacity to deal with a nuclear meltdown on their own?
Which brings us to the other advantage the federal government currently has that most states do not: the lack of a balanced budget requirement. This comes in pretty handy when something happens that would otherwise force you to make drastic cuts to your state's services to pay for it.
Many things are like traffic lights: we hate sitting at them, but if they were all taken away tomorrow it would not take long before we realized how much safer and more effective they make our roadways and we would put them back in. Unfortunately a lot of lives would be lost in learning that lesson. We risk something similar with the destruction of FEMA.