Trump announces $1,000 government-funded accounts for American babies
Source: The Guardian
Donald Trump unveiled a federal program Monday providing $1,000 government-funded investment accounts for American babies, getting big time backing from top business leaders who plan to contribute billions more to an initiative tied to the big beautiful bill.
At a White House roundtable with over a dozen CEOs, including from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies, Trump relayed the details of Trump accounts tax-deferred investment accounts tracking stock market performance for children born between 2025 and 2029.
For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market, Trump said.
The accounts will be controlled by guardians and allow additional private contributions up to $5,000 annually. Trump called it a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/09/trump-funded-accounts-babies
This is small potatoes compared to the billionaire tax breaks.

ananda
(32,043 posts)There's something fishy about this.
Nonnia Bisnez
(78 posts)SheltieLover
(69,498 posts)
ananda
(32,043 posts)What are people to them... just puppets
to put on a money string and launder it
back into their own pockets.
SheltieLover
(69,498 posts)But 6 mos of diapers?
Insulting, imo.
ananda
(32,043 posts)I guess they could buy a couple of shares of Depends....
SheltieLover
(69,498 posts)Just another scam.
DENVERPOPS
(12,524 posts)than a huge tax payer gift to the future title of our country........... The United Corporations of America
Deuxcents
(22,541 posts)This is a good investment opportunity, Im sure. I wont be around to see what happens when these accounts mature, but Im pretty sure this will end like all his other hare brained ideas.
SheltieLover
(69,498 posts)
DENVERPOPS
(12,524 posts)Just like the Republicans trying to get their greedy mitts on Social Security Funds and Medicare Funds, future Republicans will immediately start trying to figure out away to get their hands on the incredible amount of money that is collected in the next twenty years using this scam.....
Raven123
(6,728 posts)SheltieLover
(69,498 posts)
muriel_volestrangler
(103,847 posts)but if so, I'm surprised it wasn't publicised earlier. Maybe that shows the bill really is too big for anyone to read thoroughly.
Raven123
(6,728 posts)The intro is misleading. Trump is promoting a proposal in the Bill, not unveiling a new proposal.
Martin68
(25,904 posts)jls4561
(2,411 posts)1100 South Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach, FL. 33480
3catwoman3
(26,813 posts)Thats not even a drop in the bucket.° 🪣 💧
jls4561
(2,411 posts)1100 South Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach, FL. 33480
To show your appreciation.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(124,239 posts)You don't go backwards on a negotiation. 😒
Buddyzbuddy
(987 posts)
Buddyzbuddy
(987 posts)or walk into their dressing rooms at one of his pageants.
You know they let you do things to them, when your famous.
More
patphil
(7,923 posts)$1,000. doesn't come close to covering the out of pocket expenses for those women who have insurance, even if it's a non-eventful, normal pregnancy.
Without health care, a situation that many more women will soon find themselves in if that "big ugly bill" gets passed, it's closer to $20,000.
From birth to age 18 it's a whole lot more expensive.
https://www.lendingtree.com/debt-consolidation/raising-a-child-study/
So, the $1,000. is insignificant. It's a sucker deal.
Karasu
(1,324 posts)succumbing to fascism and Social Darwinist "health care" governed by anti-science policies. You'd have me to give me seven figures a year for the rest of my fucking life to even consider it.
0rganism
(25,131 posts)Hmm, how rich do you need to be to stash $5k in tax-deferred accounts every year? Pretty obvious who's getting the bigger benefits from this account.
IronLionZion
(49,087 posts)should not be reproducing and has likely not thought about how much a child is going to cost them.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(636 posts)
sheshe2
(92,317 posts)Translation: White babies, no other color need apply.
lonely bird
(2,352 posts)This is the next step in the attempted re-White-ification of the country.
The cabal of Republicans, racist-libertarians, Techbros, corporatists and religionists want more White babies, period.
One wonders if the next step will be to pre-select what children can learn what to create the drones needed to support the cabal. Not that it isnt already happening but rather it would be out in the open.
MichMan
(15,235 posts)Doodley
(11,033 posts)sakabatou
(44,840 posts)Who is he trying to bribe?
Retrograde
(11,130 posts)Just who are these guardians? Who is going to make the "private contributions"? Seems to me like another way to say, sorry, kids - you should have been born into better families (or at least wealthier ones)
lapfog_1
(30,942 posts)to eliminating SS
BidenRocks
(1,601 posts)(Very small print) Offer valid for white babies only!
HeartsCanHope
(1,074 posts)What's the difference between this and just putting this savings bonds? or a College Savings Account? Savings bonds and Savings Accounts are guaranteed, I wouldn't trust Trump! That's how we paid for our son's university degree, with Savings Bonds. He came out ahead-- with money left over. You can put up to $5000 in the Trump account yearly, but YOU put the money in, not Trump, is that right? Another way for him to grift? No thanks, DonOld!
love_katz
(3,085 posts)$1,000.00 dollars "is the square root of sweet bugger nothing " when it comes to the full costs of bearing and raising a child.
And, that goes double, with brass knobs on it, if the pregnancy in any way experiences problems.
yardwork
(66,873 posts)Javaman
(64,023 posts)
sounds to me like another way to track people from birth.
these types of accounts already exist.
I just set one up for my granddaughter last year.
Vinca
(52,183 posts)bdamomma
(68,477 posts)is the felon getting his cues from Hungary's Orban?
Read this article: from 2019
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47192612
Snip of article:
Hungarian women with four children or more will be exempted for life from paying income tax, the prime minister has said, unveiling plans designed to boost the number of babies being born.
It was a way of defending Hungary's future without depending on immigration, Viktor Orban said.
The right-wing nationalist particularly opposes immigration by Muslims.
Hungary's population is falling by 32,000 a year. Women there have fewer children than the EU average.
As part of the measures, young couples will be offered interest-free loans of 10m forint (£27,400; $36,000), to be cancelled once they have three children.
slightlv
(5,739 posts)$1000 is nothing compared with what it takes to birth a child... let alone raise it. But I'll bet groups like Quiverfull are salivating over the thought. People should start suing the government for death dismemberment and pain and suffering to the mother of an unwanted child, or when the pregnancy goes wrong as well as lifetime payments for disabled children born since RvW was nullified. Make the life of the living breathing mother worth more than a clump of non sentient cells.
jonstl08
(443 posts)Is it going to be in the child's name/SSN? If in parents since it is tax deferred if they take the money out in addition to taxes on it will they also be subject to the 10% early withdrawal penalty also.
If in child's SSN will they also be subject to the kiddie tax if they withdraw it.
Torchlight
(4,785 posts)Sure Mr. trump, sure.
twodogsbarking
(13,906 posts)Iris
(16,431 posts)Blackjackdavey
(217 posts)pretty sure you get a lot more than that to live in Alaska. Pretty sure it's still ranked near the bottom of state population. FWIW.
Nonnia Bisnez
(78 posts)All hail emperor Trump.