Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(154,067 posts)
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 02:13 PM 6 hrs ago

Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia refuse to give up on contempt charges, shred Trump admin

Source: Law & Crime

Jun 9th, 2025, 9:27 am


Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia are refusing to wave the white flag, urging a federal judge on Sunday to hold the Trump administration in contempt for allegedly orchestrating “an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage” the erroneously deported Maryland father — only to haul him back last week to face criminal charges, his attorneys say.

“Though Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia is, at long last, back in the United States following his illegal removal, to characterize the Government as having ‘complied with the court’s order’ is pure farce,” wrote Abrego Garcia’s legal team in a five-page filing. “The Government flouted rather than followed the orders of this Court and the United States Supreme Court,” the lawyers blasted.

Abrego Garcia’s attorneys are seeking contempt sanctions in Maryland, where his family filed a federal lawsuit in March to bring the legally protected dad back to the U.S. after he was shipped off on March 15. They say the Trump administration showed how easy it was for Abrego Garcia to be brought back home, calling it the “latest act of contempt” from government officials, according to Sunday’s filing, after months of alleged stonewalling.

“The Government arranged for Abrego Garcia’s return, not to Maryland in compliance with the Supreme Court’s directive … but rather to Tennessee so that he could be charged with a crime in a case that the Government only developed while it was under threat of sanctions,” his lawyers said. “The Government’s convenient ability to return Abrego Garcia in time for a press conference unveiling his indictment puts the lie to its previously feigned powerlessness to comply with this Court’s injunction.”

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/pure-farce-lawyers-for-kilmar-abrego-garcia-refuse-to-give-up-on-contempt-charges-shred-trump-admin-for-convenient-ability-to-return-him-to-us/



Full headline: ‘Pure farce’: Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia refuse to give up on contempt charges, shred Trump admin for ‘convenient ability’ to return him to US

Link to FILING (PDF viewer) - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25967185-abrego-garcia-contempt/

Link to FILING (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25967185/abrego-garcia-contempt.pdf
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia refuse to give up on contempt charges, shred Trump admin (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 6 hrs ago OP
Good! We have to fight these assholes with everything we have! Initech 6 hrs ago #1
Is there any indication exactly what incident convinced trump to walk-back his red line? Torchlight 5 hrs ago #2
I'm guessing BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #4
One of their biggest strengths is, "Where are the rest?" Hugin 5 hrs ago #3
Too bad those who did this to Mr Garcia won't "punished". rickyhall 5 hrs ago #5
Deadline: Legal Blog-Abrego Garcia is back but contempt and sanctions for Trump admin still on the table LetMyPeopleVote 4 hrs ago #6

Torchlight

(4,763 posts)
2. Is there any indication exactly what incident convinced trump to walk-back his red line?
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 03:02 PM
5 hrs ago

I was out of the loop news-wise since Thurs afternoon., and am wondering the true cause of his return- it seems unlikely that court threats would move trump to do this, and he has no cares about which way the public winds are blowing, so I'm curious as to the fundamental, or root cause of Mr. Garcia's return.

BumRushDaShow

(154,067 posts)
4. I'm guessing
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 03:24 PM
5 hrs ago

it might have had something to do with John Roberts, who has been 45's lifeboat for the past couple years now.

Hugin

(36,190 posts)
3. One of their biggest strengths is, "Where are the rest?"
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 03:10 PM
5 hrs ago

The court ordered due process for all of the detainees. Ongoing contempt.

LetMyPeopleVote

(164,398 posts)
6. Deadline: Legal Blog-Abrego Garcia is back but contempt and sanctions for Trump admin still on the table
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 04:31 PM
4 hrs ago

“The Government flouted rather than followed” court orders, Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s lawyers reminded the judge who ordered his return

Abrego Garcia is back but contempt and sanctions for Trump admin still on the table www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

Tom Jones (@earl2.bsky.social) 2025-06-09T17:29:36.117Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/abrego-garcia-returned-contempt-sanctions-trump-admin-still-table-rcna211782

Responding to the claim that the civil case is now moot due to his return, Abrego Garcia’s lawyers reminded the Obama appointee that she “still retains jurisdiction to find contempt and impose sanctions.”

They called the government’s claim that it has complied with her order “pure farce,” writing:

The Government flouted rather than followed the orders of this Court and the United States Supreme Court. Instead of facilitating Abrego Garcia’s return, for the past two months Defendants have engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage Abrego Garcia. In its latest act of contempt, the Government arranged for Abrego Garcia’s return, not to Maryland in compliance with the Supreme Court’s directive to “ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,” . . . but rather to Tennessee so that he could be charged with a crime in a case that the Government only developed while it was under threat of sanctions.


Farcical is a good summary of this case and the administration’s broader immigration stance. The description pairs well with U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s recent nod to Franz Kafka’s “The Trial,” in comparing the novel’s absurd legal ordeal to the administration’s summary removals of scores of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador’s mega-prison known for human rights abuses. (Litigation is pending separately in that case in Washington, D.C., as lawyers try to secure the immigrants’ return. That case also includes an attempt to hold the administration accountable for contempt, which is pending separately on the government’s appeal in D.C.’s federal appeals court.)

Urging Xinis to keep the civil case alive, Abrego Garcia’s lawyers said the government’s “wanton disregard for the judicial branch has left a stain on the Constitution” and that if there’s “any hope of removing that stain, it must start by shining a light on the improper actions of the Government in this tragic affair and imposing meaningful remedies.”

Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia’s criminal case is getting started in Tennessee, where he’s charged with illegally transporting undocumented immigrants. It’s an understatement to say the new case will be highly scrutinized, given how it came about in an apparent attempt by the administration to save face. That doesn’t mean federal prosecutors won’t be able to secure a conviction; they may be even more motivated to do so, given the political stakes.

On that note, ABC News reported, citing unnamed sources, that the decision to pursue the criminal case led high-ranking Tennessee prosecutor Ben Schrader to resign due to “concerns that the case was being pursued for political reasons.” Asked about the reason for his resignation, Schrader declined to comment to NBC News. If his resignation is connected to the criminal case against Abrego Garcia, then the administration’s political posturing through the Justice Department has led to the loss of yet another career prosecutor — one of this administration’s sordid legacies, as exemplified by the Eric Adams dismissal debacle earlier this year.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego...