Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ImNotGod

(1,225 posts)
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:41 PM 5 hrs ago

Sleep Sweet spot. Researchers found biological aging was lowest at 6.5-7.8 hours of sleep

What’s happening: A new study linked short and long sleep duration to accelerated biological aging across the brain, metabolism, immune system, liver, lungs, and skin.

Sweet spot. Analyzing 500K+ UK Biobank participants, researchers found biological aging was lowest at ~6.5–7.8 hours of sleep, varying by organ system and sex.

Fast-forward. But sleeping under six or over eight hours increased biological aging, disease risk, and all-cause mortality. Bad news for the third of Americans who are sleep-deprived, short slumbers showed strong links to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, depression, and chronic pain.

Beyond recovery. An often overlooked pillar of health, sleep is foundational for well-being and longevity. As consumers wake up to this reality, circadian wellness is gaining — from wearables and recovery tech to specialized lighting, diagnostics, and health

https://insider.fitt.co/study-links-sleep-duration-to-biological-aging/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sleep Sweet spot. Researchers found biological aging was lowest at 6.5-7.8 hours of sleep (Original Post) ImNotGod 5 hrs ago OP
For many years, 8 good hours was considered optimal EYESORE 9001 4 hrs ago #1
hmmm. seems like a lot of room for cause/effect error. mopinko 4 hrs ago #2
Yes, especially when we live into old age where everything begins to be compromised healthwise ImNotGod 3 hrs ago #3
Until I cought covid, I was "sleep deprived" progressoid 3 hrs ago #4

EYESORE 9001

(29,911 posts)
1. For many years, 8 good hours was considered optimal
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:50 PM
4 hrs ago

I do well to reach the 6.5 at the low end of the scale.

ImNotGod

(1,225 posts)
3. Yes, especially when we live into old age where everything begins to be compromised healthwise
Tue May 26, 2026, 01:52 PM
3 hrs ago

compared to a young, healthy adult. I haven't read the whole study but there should be age categories included with future studies.

progressoid

(53,400 posts)
4. Until I cought covid, I was "sleep deprived"
Tue May 26, 2026, 02:37 PM
3 hrs ago

Now I average 6 or 7. Tried everything before. Ironically long covid is sort of resetting my internal clock. But there are other side effects that aren't so great. I'd rather go back to 4-5 hours a night and not have had covid.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sleep Sweet spot. Researc...