General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump admins new way to bludgeon blue states, accuse of fraud then cut off funds
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/12/brace-for-impact-trump-turns-fraud-into-new-weapon-against-blue-states-00719401Brace for impact: Trump turns fraud into new weapon against blue states
SACRAMENTO, California Donald Trump has found a new way to bludgeon blue states: accuse them of fraud, then move to cut off their money.
The attacks ramping up across the map from Albany and Springfield to Denver and Sacramento follow Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz ending his reelection campaign amid allegations of welfare fraud in his state, a case Trumps MAGA allies seized to cast similar aspersions at other Democratic leaders.
The Trump administration cited unproven fraud allegations last week as it put a hold on $10 billion in child care funding to five Democratic-run states. The Department of Justice announced its launching a new division of fraud enforcement, pointing to Minnesotas fraud epidemic. And in California, acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said hes pursuing additional charges of fraud involving state homelessness programs after railing for months against Gov. Gavin Newsoms management of state spending.
Ill say one thing about our president: He told us he was going to do this, Manhattan Democrat Liz Krueger, the influential chair of the New York Senate Finance Committee, said of the administrations funding cuts. He told us he was going to punish blue states. We have to brace for impact, we have to use our legal skills, our amazing attorney general, and endless lawsuits to at least hold them back.
leftstreet
(38,883 posts)He's the king of fraud, so naturally that's what his mind runs to
DURec
Diamond_Dog
(39,811 posts)Why does every single photo of him show him with his pie hole wide open. Its disgusting.
lapfog_1
(31,688 posts)The entire reason our country exists as a country was taxation without representation.
Cutting off funding to blue states is a declaration of financial war against not only our elected representatives, but taxpayers in those states.
We should claim "states rights" and require corporations and private employers to not pay federal withholding tax at least equivalent to the cost of replacing the services that the US government refuses to fund ( if not entirely ).
It is past time for a separation, if not a divorce.
tritsofme
(19,800 posts)intended for the federal government, those individuals and businesses will still owe what they owe, only now with interest and penalties, along with some federal felony charges for whoever implemented the scheme.
lapfog_1
(31,688 posts)They can't do all the things you claim without a trial. And in this case, since the states are involved, I don't think it would be a tax court trial.
The SCOTUS can't ever claim "states rights" again for US passed legislation ( or court decisions ) if they are selective on how they impose federal law.
At the very least it will expose the hypocrisy on the right.
tritsofme
(19,800 posts)Lets stay in the reality based community.
Bayard
(28,661 posts)Depends on the day of the week.