Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tumbulu

(6,619 posts)
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:07 PM 17 hrs ago

Does anyone know why the Jack Smith deposition was released?

I am wondering, as it seems very damning, illustrating the obvious stupidity of the Republicans ( and why do none of them even introduce themselves? Who was that first idiotic inquisitor, for instance?).

It seems really strange to me and I am left wondering if it means that they ( the republicons) are not as unified around T anymore?

I’d love to hear your ideas.

Thanks in advance.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone know why the Jack Smith deposition was released? (Original Post) Tumbulu 17 hrs ago OP
The introductions were not on tape - Ms. Toad 17 hrs ago #1
Thanks for the explanation of the lack of introductions Tumbulu 17 hrs ago #4
Update: Name redacted. Ms. Toad 17 hrs ago #7
That is outrageous choie 16 hrs ago #12
I was quite surprised. Ms. Toad 16 hrs ago #13
Timing is everything and this is a disaster IMO SayItLoud 17 hrs ago #2
But was it promised to be released? Tumbulu 17 hrs ago #6
Well, everyone that I know is home reading it Tumbulu 17 hrs ago #8
I'm at 6 hours and 6 minutes . . . n/t Ms. Toad 16 hrs ago #14
It was indeed stupid NJCher 14 hrs ago #32
For the criminals involved, it was the BEST TIME to release it. CousinIT 16 hrs ago #19
Wasn't Aileen Canon instructed to release the documents? Dan 17 hrs ago #3
She gave the DOJ time to offer a counter-argument Volaris 15 hrs ago #25
Republicans couldn't hide from it any longer so they released it when no one was looking. bucolic_frolic 17 hrs ago #5
Why was it nit open testimony? SheltieLover 17 hrs ago #9
I have read almost all of the report. Not much new information there. Raven123 17 hrs ago #10
Maybe not new information for you. choie 16 hrs ago #15
Perhaps. Raven123 15 hrs ago #22
everybody knows that jan 6 was by trump for trump and about trump rampartd 14 hrs ago #30
I agree - but the video adds a dimension it is difficult to appreciate from prior text versions Ms. Toad 5 hrs ago #34
Maybe they hope it drowns out the Friday Epstein files dump? applegrove 16 hrs ago #11
Yes. H2O Man 16 hrs ago #16
This is the low-key warning to trump mercuryblues 16 hrs ago #17
Yes. H2O Man 16 hrs ago #18
The news reports from several sources say it was released by the Republicans on the committee. Nt Fiendish Thingy 15 hrs ago #21
You are right! H2O Man 15 hrs ago #26
Perhaps because Jim Jordan is a Republican? Ms. Toad 15 hrs ago #23
You are right! H2O Man 15 hrs ago #27
I'm wrong. H2O Man 15 hrs ago #24
Thank you to H2O Man 14 hrs ago #28
The transcript will make a useful roadmap for the 2027 impeachment hearings. Fiendish Thingy 15 hrs ago #20
It is going to get out anyway, so dump it when attention is at a nadir. When people RockRaven 14 hrs ago #29
Yep that's it. underpants 14 hrs ago #31
RATS SCRAMBLING for the supposed 'exits'.... Jack Valentino 14 hrs ago #33
Happy New Year Tumbulu 2 hrs ago #37
To distract from the Epstein File release? travelingthrulife 3 hrs ago #35
Could be Tumbulu 2 hrs ago #36

Ms. Toad

(38,157 posts)
1. The introductions were not on tape -
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:09 PM
17 hrs ago

The happened at the beginning - and the names were redacted in the transcript.

Tumbulu

(6,619 posts)
4. Thanks for the explanation of the lack of introductions
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:10 PM
17 hrs ago

Do you happen to know who the first one asking questions was?

Ms. Toad

(38,157 posts)
7. Update: Name redacted.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:12 PM
17 hrs ago

Most of the questioners in the first part of the transcript, at least, were redacted.

You're talking about the questioner who started: You just made some pretty definitive statements about your belief that President Trump was guilty of these charges. Is that correct?", right? That was a name redacted question.

These names were all redacted, and show up only by title/role:

Appearances: For the COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: , CHIEF CLERK , GENERAL COUNSEL , COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR AND COUNSEL , DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL , PROFESSIONAL STAFF MEMBER , CLERK , DIGITAL DIRECTOR CHIEF COUNSEL FOR OVERSIGHT , PROFESSIONAL STAFF MEMBER , CLERK , PROFESSIONAL STAFF MEMBER RESEARCH ASSISTANT , MINORITY OVERSIGHT COUNSEL , MINORITY SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR INVESTIGATIONS AND SENIOR ADVISOR , MINORITY GENERAL COUNSEL , MINORITY CHIEF COUNSEL AND SENIOR ADVISOR , MINORITY SENIOR COUNSEL , MINORITY FELLOW, MINORITY LEGAL INTERN , MINORITY COUNSEL , MINORITY INTERN MINORITY SENIOR COUNSEL MINORITY INTERN




choie

(6,544 posts)
12. That is outrageous
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:54 PM
16 hrs ago

We pay these fuckers salaries, healthcare, future pensions and other perks of their positions. How the hell do they have the right to redact their names when they were only questioning him?

Ms. Toad

(38,157 posts)
13. I was quite surprised.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:56 PM
16 hrs ago

My guess is that they were trying to protect them from harassment. That might make a teensy-weensy bit of sense if the questioners were staffers (as opposed to elected officials) - but they appear to have redacted the names of virtually every one.

SayItLoud

(1,772 posts)
2. Timing is everything and this is a disaster IMO
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:10 PM
17 hrs ago

Released on New Years Eve. Bowl games, parties, celebrations, a holiday tomorrow in the US. Worst time to release this ever.

Tumbulu

(6,619 posts)
8. Well, everyone that I know is home reading it
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:15 PM
17 hrs ago

So to me it seems like the kind of timing that illuminates how stupid the repubs are. Because most people are home resting. And now they have the time to watch the whole 8 hours.

Plus it is not going away, in time those few who go to parties will be back home and can watch it.

CousinIT

(12,200 posts)
19. For the criminals involved, it was the BEST TIME to release it.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:13 PM
16 hrs ago

This was CALCULATED this way for precisely that reason. Some of the criminals involved were DOING the depositions,obviously, so they had complete control over the timing.

Releasing it late afternoon on 12/31 when virtually ALL news stations are airing bowl games, NYE parties and ball drops, and a holiday following was INTENTIONAL to protect the #1 PERP - Donald Trump.

Volaris

(11,380 posts)
25. She gave the DOJ time to offer a counter-argument
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 12:22 AM
15 hrs ago

Feb 2nd or 20th or some such, but I'm not sure even THATS legal, since the appellate court gave her a firm date to have EVERYTHING done and discharged, and this delays that order. Probably by valantines day, somebody will go back to the appellate court and ask that the Writ be enforced, and that SHOULD be the final word on releasing it.

And then this DOJ will take another month of dissembling to actually get anything out.

Oh well. Every day they delay just brings it all that much closer to the mid terms..

SheltieLover

(76,466 posts)
9. Why was it nit open testimony?
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:20 PM
17 hrs ago

Repukes were adamant to keep it secret, then they released it?

And wtf is with not introducing themselves? Were they born in barns? Nm.

Raven123

(7,498 posts)
10. I have read almost all of the report. Not much new information there.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:23 PM
17 hrs ago

Release it while everyone is otherwise occupied on a holiday weekend. Won’t get as much attention. Smith couldn’t discuss what Cannon hasn’t released yet.

choie

(6,544 posts)
15. Maybe not new information for you.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:57 PM
16 hrs ago

But I'm sure Jack Smith's responses to the questioning, which included substantiating that trump had everything to do with January 6th , might be new to many.

Raven123

(7,498 posts)
22. Perhaps.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:28 PM
15 hrs ago

However, I think one reason they released the interview was because there wasn’t any significant new information. Whether or not people were paying attention on January 6, 2021, or followed the subsequent J6 Committee investigation and hearings is another question.

rampartd

(3,710 posts)
30. everybody knows that jan 6 was by trump for trump and about trump
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 12:38 AM
14 hrs ago

but 1/2 the country thinks trump was right to send paramilitary goons to kill godless pedophile commie democrats and the vp.

that is lust what we are up against.

Ms. Toad

(38,157 posts)
34. I agree - but the video adds a dimension it is difficult to appreciate from prior text versions
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 10:04 AM
5 hrs ago

He's answering questions, in real time, for 8 hours (with a handful of 10 minute breaks). He is calm, thoughtful, confident, and consistent. He avoids virtually all of their gaslighting tricks, and has a remarkable recall of examples to counter their worst accusations.

Probably not too many will watch it, but I was impressed.

applegrove

(130,110 posts)
11. Maybe they hope it drowns out the Friday Epstein files dump?
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:29 PM
16 hrs ago

Maybe it is because nobody will be watching on New Years' Eve, New Years' Day and the weekend? Could be anything with this lot.

H2O Man

(78,569 posts)
16. Yes.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:00 PM
16 hrs ago

The House Democrats released it. The video of Mr. Smith's testimony is particularly impressive.

mercuryblues

(16,166 posts)
17. This is the low-key warning to trump
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:05 PM
16 hrs ago

To stop his crazy assed, shit or more will be released.

Now we all know Trump all he's going to do is double down. Republicans are now in CYA mode. They will impeach if it comes down to that.

H2O Man

(78,569 posts)
18. Yes.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:09 PM
16 hrs ago

A message for republicans planning to run for re-election in 2026, as well. I think it's curious some here mistakenly seem to think the republicans released this. They didn't. Democrats did. And that's the same difference as between shit and sugar.

Fiendish Thingy

(21,926 posts)
21. The news reports from several sources say it was released by the Republicans on the committee. Nt
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:26 PM
15 hrs ago

Ms. Toad

(38,157 posts)
23. Perhaps because Jim Jordan is a Republican?
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 12:17 AM
15 hrs ago
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Wednesday released the transcript of the panel’s deposition with former special counsel Jack Smith concerning his team’s investigations and prosecutions of President Trump.


https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5668393-jack-smith-deposition-transcript-read-file/

H2O Man

(78,569 posts)
28. Thank you to
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 12:31 AM
14 hrs ago

those who corrected me here. It allowed me to also note that I was wrong on this while editing an OP I posted today.

Fiendish Thingy

(21,926 posts)
20. The transcript will make a useful roadmap for the 2027 impeachment hearings.
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 11:25 PM
15 hrs ago

With Smith making a return appearance as the star witness.

RockRaven

(18,638 posts)
29. It is going to get out anyway, so dump it when attention is at a nadir. When people
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 12:36 AM
14 hrs ago

try to address it later, insist that it is old news and they are stuck in the past.

Jack Valentino

(4,300 posts)
33. RATS SCRAMBLING for the supposed 'exits'....
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 01:04 AM
14 hrs ago

Yeah, I wondered myself why they would release that--- since GQP controlled the committee

but possibly the maggot delusional legislators supposed
that it would help them with their base base ???


Happy New Year!

travelingthrulife

(4,415 posts)
35. To distract from the Epstein File release?
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 11:41 AM
3 hrs ago

If the pic I saw a few days ago of a very young girl with her hands tied behind her back and a gag in her mouth was real, we are headed into some really ugly stuff.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone know why the ...