Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,067 posts)
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:39 AM Yesterday

Can a President, who is a convicted felon, give a legal pardon to anyone?

I do not know what the letter of the law states but it seems that he would be disqualified from giving anyone a "pardon". His criminal record should prevent that from happening?

But, I suppose it would need to go to the Supreme Court if anyone challenged the premise?

In the first place, he has never gone thru the proper channels for giving pardons to anyone. In my opinion, all of his pardons should be null and void.

Could a future president sign an executive order declaring all his "pardons" illegal and meaningless?

Donald Trump himself has stated that Biden's pardons were not legal because they were signed by an "auto pen".

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Blues Heron

(8,269 posts)
1. Unfo4tunately the way to stop the pardons was the election
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:41 AM
Yesterday

Trump will be resigning soon though that’s why he’s pardoning like there’s no tomorrow. He’s quite sick

Raven123

(7,478 posts)
3. Read the Constitution.
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:52 AM
Yesterday

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

dickthegrouch

(4,265 posts)
10. According to Wikipedia he WAS impeached, twice
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 02:15 PM
Yesterday

The language is sloppy enough to cover the exception in my opinion.
It doesn't say who had to have been impeached, or for what.

Raven123

(7,478 posts)
11. I'm not sure to what you refer.
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 03:57 PM
Yesterday

I interpret the Constitution as saying he cannot void an impeachment. If someone is convicted via an impeachment, POTUS cannot pardon that individual.

I could be wrong

EdmondDantes_

(1,317 posts)
5. What would make you think he wouldn't have pardon power?
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 11:00 AM
Yesterday

The relevant part of the Constitution mentions only that it's for federal offenses and can't be used in matters of impeachment. There's nothing about an executive order overruling any pardons, and frankly we need to get away from ruling by executive order since we aren't a monarchy and the ever more powerful executive is problematic. There's no process requirements.

“[The President] shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

As for Trump claiming an autopen disqualifies anything, he lies a lot. Relying on his rantings isn't a good idea.

Jedi Guy

(3,404 posts)
6. The Constitution grants the power to pardon but doesn't limit that power.
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 11:01 AM
Yesterday

The only real limit is that the President can only issue pardons for federal crimes. There's nothing saying he can't pardon himself, either, though that would likely be challenged.

His status as a convicted felon is irrelevant. It didn't bar him from running for the office or holding it so it doesn't stop him from exercising any of the powers of the Presidency. In theory, he could have run for office from a prison cell. The only thing that could have barred him from running is if he'd been convicted after being impeached.

The unfortunate reality is that the Framers never imagined someone like Trump running for President, let alone actually holding the office. I think they worked on the assumption that anyone holding the office would be an honorable person rather than an amoral glob of Cheetoh dust roughly shaped to look like a person.

GJGCA

(206 posts)
8. Here's the scenario--Scene takes place at 11:30pm, January 19, 2029
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 11:33 AM
Yesterday

(The President has lost the November, 2028 election.)

He issues a full pardon for all acts commited up to the moment by the Vice President.

The President signs a letter of resignation, with immediate effect.

The just pardoned Vice President is sworn in and is now President.

The President issues a full pardon (as above) for the former President.

Scene closes at 11:55pm, January 19...

Disclaimer: IANAL so maybe there's a flaw in the above. Also, if the last-minute-ness of it ruins it, just dial the clock back a week or a month.

Jedi Guy

(3,404 posts)
15. Well, according to the 22nd Amendment Trump can't run in 2028.
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:56 PM
17 hrs ago

So a more likely hypothetical might be that the GOP runs Vance in 2028 and he goes on to lose. Trump pardons him, resigns, and is then pardoned in turn by now-President Vance, who finishes the remainder of Trump's term until the President-elect is inaugurated.

On paper, there's nothing to stop Trump and Vance from doing exactly that, both for each other and for any other cronies they care to protect on their way out the door. It would dodge a challenge to a self-pardon, though I'm not convinced a challenge would succeed anyway since the Constitution doesn't say a President can't pardon himself.

I think odds are pretty decent that we'll see a slew of pardons from Trump on the way out the door. It won't be because he cares about his underlings or feels any loyalty to them, of course, because that's not how he rolls. It'd be to make sure they don't get loaded up with charges from the next administration's DoJ. Even if he's pardoned himself or been pardoned by Vance, he wouldn't want that kind of testimony happening about his time in office since he can avoid it so easily and it'd be a cheerfully hoisted middle finger to an incoming Democratic President.

kimbutgar

(26,721 posts)
9. Can he pardon himself before he leaves office in January 2029?
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 11:58 AM
Yesterday

For his crimes against humanity?

kentuck

(115,067 posts)
12. Our history goes back to the Magna Carta...
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 04:01 PM
Yesterday

....which said that no man could be a judge to himself. Why do we even ask such questions? It was directed to King John. Is that no longer relevant?

kimbutgar

(26,721 posts)
13. Thanks I didn't know this !
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 05:42 PM
22 hrs ago

But would you honestly put it past the orange piggy to pardon himself?

Jedi Guy

(3,404 posts)
16. "Our history goes back to the Magna Carta..."
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 11:03 PM
17 hrs ago

The Magna Carta isn't the law of the land, though, so anything it has to say absolutely isn't relevant. The Constitution is, and the Constitution doesn't expressly say a President can't pardon himself. That being the case, he probably can even though it wasn't what the Framers envisioned.

It probably won't matter, anyway. As GJGCA pointed out upthread, all Trump has to do is pardon Vance, resign so Vance becomes President, and then accept a pardon from Vance. That sidesteps the self-pardon question entirely and is clearly Constitutional, though deeply cynical and abusive of the intent of the power to pardon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can a President, who is a...