General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReal Time with Bill Maher guests - Friday, June 13, 2025
Real Time with Bill Maher continues its 23rd season Friday, June 13 (10:00-11:00 p.m. live ET/7:00-8:00 p.m. PT), with a replay at 12:01 a.m., exclusively on HBO.
This week features a one-on-one interview with Sen. John Fetterman, Democratic senator from Pennsylvania.
This week's in-studio panel discussion will include Ian Bremmer, president and founder of the Eurasia Group and GZERO Media; and Rutger Bregman, Dutch historian and author of Moral Ambition: Stop Wasting Your Talent and Start Making a Difference.
Prairie Gates
(7,133 posts)Xavier Breath
(6,420 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(6,665 posts)They aren't a sycophantic minon of a bigoted, sexist, anti-vax, rich, white male TV celebrity who parrots right wing talking points straight from FAUX News.
Paladin
(32,222 posts)Simeon Salus
(1,556 posts)It wasn't so long ago it was Dennis Miller who had lost his humanity; people started laughing AT him and not at his jokes.
newdeal2
(4,702 posts)JBTaurus83
(847 posts)Any progressives or liberals still watch Bill Maher.
Paladin
(32,222 posts)Particularly after all the hard work Maher has put in over the years, devolving into a rightwing pimp. Credit where credit is due...
I watched him until maybe a year ago, but hes really gone over the edge.
Paladin
(32,222 posts)The only way I keep up with his garbage output is from online reports I come across, here on DU and elsewhere.
Crunchy Frog
(28,211 posts)Celerity
(53,559 posts)
UTUSN
(76,721 posts)the Lib open mindedness, and at minimum the facilitating for Opposition Research.
Rhiannon12866
(249,413 posts)And if I'm not interested in something, I just skip over it. *sigh*
UTUSN
(76,721 posts)to be constructive in instead of being irresistibly drawn to one they don't like and feeling compelled to express their personal peeve, especially if claiming to be more-Lib-Than-Thou.
Rhiannon12866
(249,413 posts)So if someone's not interested, they can just skip over it.
UTUSN
(76,721 posts)a corporate tool, which is obvious envy for Steven's success surviving compared to MAHER's having been cancelled. There's also MAHER's (and my) anti-religion/superstition compared to Stephen's extreme Catholicism (me, Lapsed).
Rhiannon12866
(249,413 posts)And I kind of dropped out after I reached my teens, despite being baptized and confirmed. I'd give a lot to have the faith that my father did, but at the time I had a big resentment because he sent me to a boarding school where we had "chapel" every day.
AZProgressive
(29,808 posts)That is how much he has moved over to the right. Look at his one on one guest which is the most pro Trump Democrat in the Senate.
I usually do skip over these threads but DU is a place where people like to give their personal opinion but there seems to be a strong effort to silence dissent of Maher.
UTUSN
(76,721 posts)Abolishinist
(2,879 posts)those on DU who criticize or disagree with Maher are being shut down, discredited, silenced?
Abolishinist
(2,879 posts)Well, at least part of it, I doubt Ill watch Fetterman. As were busy with other things this evening Im taping it, so I can fast forward.
Ruther Bregman, a Dutch historian and author, sounds interesting. His books Humankind: A Hopeful History (2020) and Utopia for Realists: And How We Can Get There (2017) were both Sunday Times and New York Times Best Sellers and have been translated in 46 languages.
In an interview with the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir in September 2017, Bregman said that "to move forward, a society needs dreams, not nightmares. Yet people are caught in the logic of fear. Whether it is Trump, Brexit or the last elections in Germany, they vote against the future and instead for solutions to replace it, believing the past was better based on a thoroughly mistaken view of the world: the world was worse before."
And of course, his opening and New Rules are usually fun. Thanks for posting!
question everything
(51,628 posts)Thanks for postings.
Individuals here who "do not watch," who need their weekly dose of fu**ing do not realize, or refuse to realize that in order to win one has to be familiar with what the other side says. For me Maher is preferable to Fox or whatever the White House issues.
And at least Maher can be funny and his "New Rules" can be eye opening.
Rhiannon12866
(249,413 posts)We often see guests on the show that we see nowhere else and it's often eye opening.
Response to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Henry203
(835 posts)I knew he was a phony.