Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CrispyQ

(39,789 posts)
4. By mobility issues, do you mean people who are unable to drive due to physical limitations?
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 02:58 PM
Wednesday

Regarding the drunk driver issue, shouldn't drivers be required to operate the vehicle in case of a malfunction? If not, then why not let kids drive driverless cars?

Blues Heron

(7,103 posts)
14. Exactly, you might be right on the second one, but if they can get them working really well, might save lives
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 04:09 PM
Wednesday

Blues Heron

(7,103 posts)
13. You don't own your own taxi though, if these things can work (a big if) then they could be a game changer
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 04:08 PM
Wednesday

Klarkashton

(3,567 posts)
2. They are piloted by "assisting drivers" in India and other places.
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 02:52 PM
Wednesday

It's all bogus. Same for the stupid Tesla robot thing that is controlled by a guy in a sensor suit to make it look like it can do all this impossible shit while it simply follows the guy's movements by RC.
While I'm at it the robot dog is RC controlled as well.

Response to MIButterfly (Original post)

MIButterfly

(579 posts)
8. Thank you.
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 03:11 PM
Wednesday

That makes more sense to me than anything else I've heard, especially about helping a disabled person live more independently.

But I think there are a LOT of bugs to work out before it's safe enough for the masses.

Response to MIButterfly (Reply #8)

Torchlight

(4,834 posts)
10. No so much glorious as just 'comfort and convenience,
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 03:16 PM
Wednesday

those two boogeymen of the post-rational age' (as my freshman Western Civ prof was so fond of saying way back when)

Giving it the time to advance and work out the kinks, I'd love to sit back and read the morning paper (o-kay, grandpa!), drink coffee, and let my mind wander during our 45 minute daily commute as I imagine was done on the commuter trains in the NE years back.

Renew Deal

(84,053 posts)
11. There are a lot of benefits
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 03:21 PM
Wednesday

You don't have the cost of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, and parking a car.

The "driver" is reliably safe. No speeding, no emotions, better visibility of the road because of all the cameras

The cars are generally nice, clean, and comfortable.

Less wait time while a driver finishes some other conflicting rides. There are plenty of these drivers working multiple services. So they could be finishing a food delivery with Uber while picking someone else for Lyft. This leads to long wait times and sometimes aromatic cars.

It's great for people with disabilities who would otherwise not be able to drive themselves. I think there's an estimate that driverless cars could put 4 million people with disabilities into the workforce.

There are other benefits, but these are the main ones in my opinion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is so glorious about...