Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Jackson warns the Supreme Court is manipulating the rules to benefit Trump - Ian Millhiser @ Vox
Vox
On Friday, the Supreme Court handed down a brief order permitting the Department of Government Efficiency, the enigmatic White House entity that billionaire Elon Musk previously ran, to access a wide range of sensitive information kept by the Social Security Administration including many individuals bank account numbers and medical records. All three of the Courts Democrats dissented from the Courts order in Social Security Administration v. AFSCME.
Realistically, it was always likely that the Trump administration would eventually prevail in this case. As Solicitor General D. John Sauer argues in the administrations brief, the plaintiffs in AFSCME do not contend that their information has been shared with parties outside the government. Rather, this case boils down to whether the courts can second-guess the executive branchs decisions about which government employees may see data that is already held by the government. These sorts of internal management decisions typically are not subject to judicial review.
Yet, while the result in AFSCME isnt surprising, the case reveals a schism within the Court and it highlights how the Trump administration has managed to successfully circumvent normal court procedures to quickly get their grievances before a largely sympathetic Supreme Court.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jacksons dissenting opinion primarily focuses on her concerns over the rapidity with which the Court hears Trump cases, and she argues that her Republican colleagues appear to have abandoned an important limit on the Courts authority (or, at least, that theyve done so when the Trump administration asks them to prematurely get involved with a case).
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Justice Jackson warns the Supreme Court is manipulating the rules to benefit Trump - Ian Millhiser @ Vox (Original Post)
In It to Win It
5 hrs ago
OP
Bayard
(25,402 posts)1. The Supremes aren't, "second guessing," the Executive Branch
Actually, they are already not doing their job of checks and balances on the two other branches.
sop
(14,583 posts)2. It's official, we no longer have three separate but equal branches of government, just Dictator Trump.
rickyhall
(5,269 posts)3. Tthe USSC is part of the agenda..
nowforever
(530 posts)4. Americans who voted for Trump
Most uninformed and brainwashed electorate in history. The GOP and their rich benefactors are willing to destroy everything just to accumulate more for themselves. I believe weo are the verge of a collapse unless the powerful voices that still love this nation continue to stay silent.
nowforever
(530 posts)5. Trump voters
Most uninformed and brainwashed electorate in history. The GOP and their rich benefactors are willing to destroy everything just to accumulate more for themselves. I believe weo are the verge of a collapse unless the powerful voices that still love this nation continue to stay silent.