General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court leaves in place Maryland's ban on assault-style rifles.
'The Supreme Court declined to take up a pair of gun-rights cases Monday, leaving in place Marylands ban on semiautomatic military-style rifles and Rhode Islands restrictions on large-capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
The courts action drew dissents from three conservatives, showing the Supreme Court still divided on how to handle Second Amendment cases after the justices expanded gun rights in a 2022 landmark decision.
Justice Clarence Thomas said the high court should have reviewed the lower court ruling in the Maryland case and not put off the question of whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. The answer, he wrote, is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR-15 owners throughout the country.
Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh agreed with the decision to sidestep the cases for now, but wrote separately to caution against reading too much into Marylands ban remaining intact. He called the lower court ruling upholding the law questionable and said the Supreme Court should eventually address the validity of bans on assault-style rifles like the AR-15 in the next term or two.'>>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/06/02/supreme-court-firearms-ban-new-cases/?

SheltieLover
(69,618 posts)
Response to SheltieLover (Reply #1)
Post removed
k_buddy762
(638 posts)WarGamer
(17,267 posts)DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,386 posts)It simply means this specific case was not one they like for whatever reason. As it stands now, there appear to be 4 votes to overturn these bans. And there are around a dozen different cases working their way through the court system. It takes 4 votes to grant Cert and hear the case. Does anyone want to bet that BOTH Roberts and Barrett would vote with the liberal justices and keep these laws in place? That's not a bet I would take. Once the "right" case comes up, watch one or both vote with the other 4.
Igel
(36,795 posts)"Not the right case for determining precedent." More or less, putting words into their mouths.
UTUSN
(74,408 posts)elleng
(139,717 posts)most of these are 'housekeeping' 'stays,' to enable business to proceed as necessary.