Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(139,717 posts)
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 03:04 PM Jun 2

Supreme Court leaves in place Maryland's ban on assault-style rifles.

'The Supreme Court declined to take up a pair of gun-rights cases Monday, leaving in place Maryland’s ban on semiautomatic military-style rifles and Rhode Island’s restrictions on large-capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

The court’s action drew dissents from three conservatives, showing the Supreme Court still divided on how to handle Second Amendment cases after the justices expanded gun rights in a 2022 landmark decision.

Justice Clarence Thomas said the high court should have reviewed the lower court ruling in the Maryland case and not put off the question of whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. The answer, he wrote, is of “critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR-15 owners throughout the country.”

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh agreed with the decision to sidestep the cases for now, but wrote separately to caution against reading too much into Maryland’s ban remaining intact. He called the lower court ruling upholding the law “questionable” and said the Supreme Court should eventually address the validity of bans on assault-style rifles like the AR-15 in the next term or two.'>>>

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/06/02/supreme-court-firearms-ban-new-cases/?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court leaves in place Maryland's ban on assault-style rifles. (Original Post) elleng Jun 2 OP
I hope & trust other states will follow MD's lead! SheltieLover Jun 2 #1
Post removed Post removed Jun 2 #5
kicking the can down the road k_buddy762 Jun 2 #2
Yes I suggest everyone read the whole article... WarGamer Jun 2 #3
Yep, denying cert is not ruling on the merits DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2 #4
That's how the punditry's breaking. Igel Jun 2 #6
My head spins from all the temporary stays and this Later-type things - am 78, can't wait forever UTUSN Jun 2 #7
U and I HAVE to wait, elleng Jun 2 #8
Will try to keep up with you! UTUSN Jun 2 #9

Response to SheltieLover (Reply #1)

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,386 posts)
4. Yep, denying cert is not ruling on the merits
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 06:03 PM
Jun 2

It simply means this specific case was not one they like for whatever reason. As it stands now, there appear to be 4 votes to overturn these bans. And there are around a dozen different cases working their way through the court system. It takes 4 votes to grant Cert and hear the case. Does anyone want to bet that BOTH Roberts and Barrett would vote with the liberal justices and keep these laws in place? That's not a bet I would take. Once the "right" case comes up, watch one or both vote with the other 4.

Igel

(36,795 posts)
6. That's how the punditry's breaking.
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 10:09 PM
Jun 2

"Not the right case for determining precedent." More or less, putting words into their mouths.

UTUSN

(74,408 posts)
7. My head spins from all the temporary stays and this Later-type things - am 78, can't wait forever
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 11:19 PM
Jun 2

elleng

(139,717 posts)
8. U and I HAVE to wait,
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 11:35 PM
Jun 2

most of these are 'housekeeping' 'stays,' to enable business to proceed as necessary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court leaves in p...