General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA different perspective about Trump and his psychotic desire to annex Canada (hear me out)
I believe Democrats should ignore this bluster.
First, it will NEVER happen. Secondly, if it does, Canada should state we accept on the condition that every province becomes a state. The state of Quebec. The state of Ontario. The state of British Columbia. Even Nunavut, NW Territories, and Yukon should become states immediately.
That would give us 13 more states, each one solidly behind gun control, the right to choose, universal health care, and all the things we as Democrats want and support.
That's 26 new senators at at least 45 representatives apportioned out to the new "states." Expect those to come from the lowest EV states first, all those with between 4-6 EVs will drop to 3 immediately. That means the GOP will lose 18 Reps immediately since 9 out of the 15 states will 4-6 EVs are Republican states.
When that happens, the Senate will have 26 new Senators. Assuming that Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Alberta continue to be Republican and Quebec, and the Canadian territories go purple as they usually do in Canada, assuming 16 new Democratic senators would not be far-fetched. Taking the current make up of the Senate adding this, it would be 63 - 63.
The House would be different as there should be a huge increase in Democrats, so assuming 75% of the Canadian delegation being Democrats isn't farfetched. If they keep the 435 number, assuming re-apportionment trends, that means the Republicans will lose big time. We could literally see a House where the Democrat hold an unbreakable majority to an almost super majority. Democrats holding 60% of the 435 (meaning at least 260 seats) permanently would be possible.
Then there's the SCOTUS. We would need at least four more circuits.
Finally, the EV. If this happens, there would be no path to the WH for the Republicans. Even with TX and FL, most states with over 20 EVS (including PA and IL) are blue.
One last thing. . .this also doesn't take into consideration the mentality that the Canadians will blame the Republican Party for losing their country. Even the most conservative Canadian will vote against the Republicans en masse, just like black people voted FOR the Republican Party as a voting block until 1964 due to the thinking that the Republicans ended slavery.
With all this, I'd say "do it Donald. You don't see the political consequences internally.
Even if Canada becomes just one state, that's two more Democrats and at least 45 new Congress critters in the House taken mostly from red states.
Good luck with that.
IF all this happens, expect statehood to pass in PR, Virgin Islands, Guam, Marianas, and Samoa (and possibly DC). That's six more BLUE states.

bucolic_frolic
(50,014 posts)One state, or states based on population. Is Canada equal to 2 Californias?
Maybe there would be 4 states. The Pacific, The Plains, The Legacy Core, and The Maritimes.
Then you have to deport groups you don't like and exclude single women because.
I doubt it will happen, but it's not a zero probability.
Blue Full Moon
(2,074 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(19,134 posts)All these hypotheticals about how many states/senators/judges adding Canada to the US ignore the real consequences of Annexation:
Annexing Canada would require the illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation, resulting in the deaths of thousands of American soldiers as well as Canadians. The killing would not end until the last American soldier left Canadian soil.
Thats what Democrats and responsible journalists should be talking about- Why does Donald Trump want to go to war with the closest ally America has ever had, and how many soldiers is he willing to sacrifice to add a star to the flag.
We talk about Greenland and Panama that way, why not Canada?
Talk of annexation is not some hypothetical parlor game, it is talk of invasion, occupation, death and destruction.
After todays election, I expect Carney to take decisive action to strengthen and create defence and trade relationships with Europe, Asia and the rest of the world. Now that the US cannot be depended upon for trade or defence agreements, I believe Canada should become a nuclear power, with enough warheads pointed south to deter Trump or any future US despot from invading.
Elbows Up, by any means necessary.
LeftinOH
(5,511 posts)every time someone in the administration mentions it.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,551 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(19,134 posts)Your post, while well intentioned, was incomplete because it left out the very real life and death consequences of any attempt at annexation.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,551 posts)This entire idea of annexing anything is incomprehensibly stupid and toxic.
But. . .if it did happen, my post is the end result politically.
Sadly, Dickhead in the White House got it from Crimea and Putin.
Fiendish Thingy
(19,134 posts)is the epitome of absurdity, IMO.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,551 posts)Scrivener7
(55,508 posts)Please just stop.
Bernardo de La Paz
(54,980 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(19,134 posts)I am a dual citizen living in B.C.
Disaffected
(5,518 posts)Enough from Trump et al and, enough from DU.
obamanut2012
(28,421 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Canadians have no fucking interest in becoming part of your dysfunctional nation.
Sid